User talk:Estebanpirazo

This is Estebanpirazo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volta (Cirque du Soleil) (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One source don't establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volta (Cirque du Soleil) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 15:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Estebanpirazo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 15:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Volta (Cirque du Soleil) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Volta (Cirque du Soleil). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volta (Cirque du Soleil) (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Icebob99 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Try and look for sources that the general public would read. Le Journal de Montreal is a good place to start, but the other sources are related to entertainment in some way, shape, or form, and thus can't be considered independent under Wikipedia's notability guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volta (Cirque du Soleil) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Icebob99 (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volta (Cirque du Soleil) has been accepted

Volta (Cirque du Soleil), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Triptothecottage (talk) 08:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Volta (Cirque du Soleil)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Volta (Cirque du Soleil), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.cirquedusoleil.com/fr/press/news/2016/volta-tickets-on-sale-cirque-club.aspx https://www.cirquedusoleil.com/en/press/news/2016/volta-tickets-on-sale-cirque-club.aspx, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Volta (Cirque du Soleil) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Volta (Cirque du Soleil), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Volta (Cirque du Soleil). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Volta (Cirque du Soleil) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Volta (Cirque du Soleil) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Justlettersandnumbers, I contacted Cirque du Soleil directly regarding your comment about the material found on their webpage being copyrighted, and their answer is that the material on those pages is part of their press releases, and free to use if needed. I actually explained them what I used their information for, and they answered they have no problem with me using it in the creation of the Wikipedia page for the Cirque du Soleil show Volta. Please let me know how to proceed in this case, to reinstate the Wikipedia page I have created, and let me know if you need me to forward you the e-mail I received directly from them stating this material is free to use. The page I created also has several other references to independent material that are free to use for the creation of the Wikipedia page of this show. Thanks. Estebanpirazo (talk) 11:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hi! You've had an invitation to the Teahouse, but have not tried posting there. Why don't you give it a try? You might get the same answers you've had from me, or some different ones. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I might give it a try. Unfortunately, so far, this has been a very frustrating and confusing experience, as some article creation rules and "standards" apply to some pages, but not to others, and when I have questioned the reason for some of the decisions taken by editors, I have received sometimes hostile answers and snarky comments. I now have a bad taste in my mouth due to this, but as I said, I might give it a try in the future. Thanks again for the suggestion. Estebanpirazo (talk) 12:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Factual information deleted from the Crystal show article

Moved from my talk.

– Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers, I would like to know the reason of deleting uncontroversial factual information about the Cirque du Soleil show Crystal(basic general information, show dates, show's creative team).

Due to issues we have been previously having with the Volta show, and to your suggestion, I asked the question on the Wikipedia Teahouse, and this was the answer I got:

"Wikipedia has essentially no interest in what the subject of an article, or anybody closely associated with the subject, says about the subject. This is not 100% true - sometimes uncontroversial factual data about a subject, such as places and dates, may be added to an article that are taken from non-independent sources such as press releases or their own website; but most of the content in any article should come from published sources completely independent of the subject. If there is not enough about the subject from completely independent sources, then it is impossible to write an acceptable article about it - the jargon is that the subject is not notable."

My understanding from the bold part of the answer is that such factual information is okay to be added to an article, coming from a press release or the official website of the show. According to the answer I received on the Wikipedia Teahouse, could you please revert the deletions made to this article, and add again the factual information that it contained?, or explain to me why is this information being deleted from the article?, and also if this same information should be deleted also from the other 40 shows presented by Cirque du Soleil? Thanks. Estebanpirazo (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You tell me you want a different opinion, but then ask mine again. I'm not sure what to do about that, but here's my answer (unchanged from before). As I've said over and over again, Wikipedia doesn't care what people or organisations say about themselves – Wikipedia is built on independent reliable sources. Lists of dates and minor personnel are not encyclopaedic material – please see WP:NOTDIR, which stands for "Wikipedia is not a directory". If you find such material elsewhere, you can remove it.

Question: do you have some connection to the show or its organisers? If so, you must declare it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers, thanks for getting back to me. I came back to you because I received on the Teahouse (as per your suggestion) an answer completely different to the answers I've been receiving from you. I am confused still, because if you read the answer I received, it is okay to use a non-independent source for factual information, and still, you keep answering that this is not acceptable. I just want to know what the real problem is in here... or if you are now going to start editing all of the other 40 shows and deleting information according to your rule about factual information. FYI, I am a big fan of Cirque du Soleil, but that's it; I have no direct or indirect connection whatsoever with the show or its organizers, other than purchasing tickets in the past to attend some of their shows. Right at this moment, I think it is very unfair the way my questions and my edits have been handled, and I am not happy with the way things have been managed here. Final question: are you going to revise each Cirque du Soleil show Wikipedia article and delete all the factual information you encounter because it does not come from an independent source?. Good luck! Estebanpirazo (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alegría: In a New Light

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alegría: In a New Light requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.cirquedusoleil.com/press/kits/shows/alegria. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dorsetonian (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]