User talk:Esquivalience/Archives/ 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Esquivalience. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:45, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Question
so you took of one of my annotations for the wolf of wall st for not providing a source, i think. just wondering, how do you put a source in? thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.66.40.17 (talk) 01:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello
Thank you very much for a warm welcome! :) Mrwilhelm (talk) 01:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Your experience with Wikipedia so far
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.
To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op
To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85
Thanks!
Gabrielm199 (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
AFC Review Dispute
Hi, would like to understand your recent Afc review of Draft:Hradyesh and the mentioned reason. The stub article contains 19 reliable sources from prime national newspaper's, auto magazines, book and 10 plus world records details cited from the respective registrar's. All of them are reliable independent sources establishing notability. Also please explain your views about the promotional comment. I personally dont allow promotions will be happy to correct if missing something.
Secondly, as per last submission summary details it was clearly mentioned the article is resubmitted only when the acceptance is received to publish the article to main space from the last reviewer mentioned here User_talk:Lor/Archive_5#Awaiting_your_views_-_Thanks and was waiting for further process.
Thirdly, as commented earlier too by other reviewer and added on talk page of article , the title is create protected and hence administrator help is requested. -Thanks One life to live (talk) 04:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki
Hello, Esquivalience, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 10:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC) |
Error correction for AdBlock
Hi!
Just thought I'd leave a message to let you know that I've corrected the page about AdBlock from your recent edit, where you changed the lettering of the original Adblock project (from beofre ABP, not AdBlock, which came after ABP - I know, it's confusing) to AdBlock. (I left the other change you made in, as I agree that it does add to the article).
Don't get me wrong, I completely understand why you made the change, and don't blame you for making an obviously good-faith change. I've left a note on the talk page of AdBlock as well about the confusion between the names, so that future editors like yourself know about the confusion.
Thanks for helping improve Wikipedia!
Itskieran (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Neo-feudalism
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Neo-feudalism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ag-gag
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ag-gag. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Union Station (Los Angeles)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Union Station (Los Angeles). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Amy Pascal
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Amy Pascal. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Walter O'Brien
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Walter O'Brien. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Edit summary
I see this edit in my watchlist and I wonder, "this person's obsessed with edit summaries, they made a dummy edit just to day that they fixed something with their last edit", then I click on "hist". Now I see why you did that! Thanks for the laugh! --AmaryllisGardener talk 04:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:TurboTax
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:TurboTax. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Wikia
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wikia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Mohale Dam
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohale Dam. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
CSD of Sangeeta N Kale
I've declined it as it's fairly clear that the article asserts notability, even though it's quite possible the subject is not notable. Applicable policies would include WP:ACADEMIC, WP:NPERSON and WP:GNG. NativeForeigner Talk 21:52, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)