User talk:Esprit de corps

Blocked indef.

Per here: [1]. Socks are bad! If you wish to contest this blocking please use the {{unblock}} template. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 14:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Esprit de corps (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I being blocked, NONE of my contributions have been vandalism, look and see. I don't know who Daniel Chase, Enigmma, or Persian poet girl are. You're blocking me because I logged in on a public computer, the same ones that some vandal used? This makes no sense and it's not fair. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Per Scarian and Alison -- clearly a good block. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 16:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's an example of some vandalism: [2]. You were appropriately warned for it too. :-) Bye-bye. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 16:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Esprit de corps (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I did do that I forgot. It was over the Fenway Park article. But where did I vandalize any of the people you named? Nowhere. 40,000+ people go to this school and they all use the library's computers with the same ranges of IP addresses. It wasn't me who did that other stuff. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

I'd suggest emailing one of those administrators. Based on what they have, this appears to be a properly placed block. Using multiple accounts to vandalize or evades blocks is against policy. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins: - this block is to be regarded as a checkuser block, as this editor has shared two very distinct IP addresses, including a domestic ISP , with a single, indefblocked vandal who has been involved in abusive socking to harassing others - Alison ^❤ 21:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Esprit de corps (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fuck those administrators, I did nothing to them. And yet they are allowed to codemn me for some idiot who vandalized from the one of thousands of IP addresses here at UMCP that they think is me. I am only guilty of lashing out at an editor for Fenway Park, nothing else. Unblock me now.

Decline reason:

That tone of voice just got this page protected. COngrats. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.