User talk:Esowteric/Archives/2009/September

Thanks

... for keeping an eye while I was gone. --JN466 23:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Hope you had a good time. Esowteric+Talk 11:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. That's all I'm gonna say about it here. :) On a different matter, I just came across Wikipedia:Reward_board#Help_bring_Sufism_in_India_to_at_least_B_class. Not sure it's up your street, but I thought I'd mention it. Best, JN466 20:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion on wahabi Myth

I think at least that article must be deleted and the author of that article seems to have a pro wahabi approach.

I am of the Opinion that Wahabi page should show the reality of that Particular Movement and not POV of some Individual.So I request you to Please examine that article from time to time in Order to save it from NON neutral editors.

Shabiha ^(t) 19:10, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Shabiha. Yes, I'm sure you're right. Esowteric+Talk 19:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Osrry i had only just seen all your messages. I dont agree with three warnings as you warned me three times for one group of edits but irrespective, I am happy to see that you have acknowledged the need for intermediation. As you know I have been trying to resolve this for a long time and had to resort to drastic measures as I can only be patient for so long regarding offensive articles and I think I have waited a long time for intermediation from someone neutral.

I hope this situation can be resolved. thanks and all the best.

David.Baratheon (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC) 16:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

I have posted in your discussion page

Hi I have posted in your discussion page as I am unsure of where best to post so please have alook. We need to first get someone who is not muslim and doesn't have apolitical view against Saudi or Muslims or "wahhabi's" and is just interested in analsying teh evidence and creating the page for us (it shoudl be locked from editing) based on what seems to be the truth. thanks and all teh best

David.Baratheon (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC) 16:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

The issue of wahhabi and salafi pages

FOr one thing, sabiha has acknkowledged on her home page that she is a sufi so I dont think she is able to keep a neutral point of view. The intermediators must be someone who is not muslim nor has an opinion on the subject. The sufi's (Who are staunchly opposed to the salafi's and the "wahhabi's" are welcome to bring their evidences on teh understanding that they are biased party as much as I am and that the salafi's are equally entitled to be represented as the sufi's (who are very active posters here) it is vital in the interests of fairness taht the overwhelming sufi majority here are not allowed to push POV. The sufi article is basically all about their beliefs and religion and lokos like a BBC documentary so why dont salafi's get the same treatment?

David.Baratheon (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC) 16:15, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

David, you were previously told not to delete content from Wahhabi. I issued a level 2 warning for further deletions; then a level 3 for deleting other people's comments at Wahhabi talk; then a level 4 warning for deletions to Salafi. Regarding 'The "Wahhabi" Myth' article, please add your comments to the articles for deletion page, not here. Thanks, Esowteric+Talk 16:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC)