User talk:Eskimospy/old3

Archive 1 - Archive 2 - Archive 3 - Talk page

it was a joke

Sorry. It was a joke. Next time don't be so quick to accuse, instead leave a KIND message. OK? Scepia

I am sorry, I wasn't actually serious, (the "talk to me" link to the practical joke page was supposed to be a stupid counter-joke). By the way, I liked the new message thing. No hard feelings.--eskimospy (talk • count) 00:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverend

I had not noticed many users with Reverend-names in my wiki journeys, but, yes, I am a Reverend with the Universal Life Church. ReverendG 17:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 17	23 April 2007	About the Signpost

Administrator goes rogue, is blocked	Wales unblocks Brandt, then reverses himself
Historian detained after his Wikipedia article is vandalized	Efforts to reform Requests for Adminship spark animated discussion
Canadian politician the subject of an edit war	Virginia Tech massacre articles rise to prominence
Wikipedia enters China one disc at a time	WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
News and notes: Unreferenced biographies, user studies, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Hi, as you will see my RFA has closed successfully. I should like to thank you for nominating me and if I can help you at any time please get straight on to me. TerriersFan 19:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:User c++-N

Hi there. I noticed you created Category:User c++-N, however, this category was previously merged to Category:User c++-4 and then deleted after this UCFD. I have speedy deleted the category as recreation of previously deleted content. Thanks for understanding! VegaDark 08:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 06:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

born of/to

Hi Eskimospy - fair enough change. "Born of" does sound pretty much an archaism these days, though there's not a great deal of difference in the meaning. Grutness...wha? 00:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I guess so.--eskimospy (talk • contribs • count) 00:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 18	30 April 2007	About the Signpost

Students in Western Civilization course find editing Wikipedia frustrating, rewarding	Statistics indicate breadth of Wikipedia's appeal
Featured lists reaches a milestone	Backlogs continue to grow
WikiWorld comic: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Board resolutions, user studies, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Eskimospy. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that: you have little experience vandalfighting. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego ^talk 16:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Tyler edits

Um, what's with the warning? All I did was remove something that said "STEVEN TYLER ROCKS MY RED SOX" or something like that. Is that not vandalism.

By the way, this is not my last warning, since all the other warnings were false alarms as well. Take a look again. Thank you.

131.156.238.75 07:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that. I was probably going to revert someone elses edits, and you must have done it right before me. Then since you are an ip, it's hard for me to tell which user you are so I ended up pressing the revert button not knowing you had made an edit. Thanks.--eskimospy (talk • contribs • count) 07:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]