User talk:Escrituras

Good research

Please, research before creating or modifying articles without verifying their authenticity. --Escrituras (talk) 01:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Church of God Ministerial of Jesus Christ

The article Church of God Ministerial of Jesus Christ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article for the same religious organization Church of God Ministry of Jesus Christ International

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pownerus (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Liz and Dennis Brown. For the same reason it has probed and it has proof in the Talk pages of the articles, it has established that the named Church of God Ministerial of Jesus Christ and Church of God Ministerial of Jesus Christ International is not the same religious entity or legal entity. We propose you Pownerus to update the two articles with accuracy information. Also it maybe keeps the links between articles. Honestly, --Escrituras (talk) 23:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can always remove the PROD and he can't replace it, but he can send it to WP:AFD. As far as if the two are the same or not, I'm not going to delve into that. That isn't a matter for admin to decide, that is for the community of editors as a whole to decide. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 00:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tutelary (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014, Reply

Dear Tutelary, thanks for your gently message. On the talk page of the article that you've updated, we have left important information that establishes a separation of the two articles in question. If you consider joining information from two articles, we believe that a redirect link is right. Best regards. --Escrituras (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then create the text for the church, then. Don't copy text from another article. I redirected because this is the case. Tutelary (talk) 00:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, thanks for your help. We are going to create the text for this article. --Escrituras (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Liz and Dennis Brown. --Escrituras (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something else, unless that church is actually a distinct, different entity, and unless you have reliable sources (not uploaded images) that demonstrate it is, then you should expect the article to get deleted as a WP:FORK or duplicate article. The standards at the English Wikipedia are probably a lot tougher than the Spanish Wikipedia, as there are more people working the articles here. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 01:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]