User talk:Escfrip

September 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nintendo Entertainment Planning & Development. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. clpo13_(talk) 20:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• Final Warning - if you revert any more times without holding a discussion on the talk page, you'll be blocked from editing. Please only edit from one account too. Sergecross73 msg me 19:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

• • I don't have multiple accounts. -Escfrip

• Glad to hear it. But you didn't seem to follow the rest of what I said though, considering that your only edit for today was to revert again without any discussion or explanation. As such, you are blocked from editing for 3 days. Next time, I hope you will handle disputes according to Wikipedia's ways - by discussing it on the talk page and only making the change if there is a general agreement to do so. Sergecross73 msg me 01:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You've already been blocked for this once before. Anymore reverting without consensus and you're blocked again. Sergecross73 msg me 20:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

It seems you've chosen to blatantly ignore this basic concept and warning once again, so you're blocked again, for a month this time. Sergecross73 msg me 21:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Please do not disruptive edits at List of Nintendo Switch games. Your first two edits were to remove a sourced row without explanation and to blank a talk page section. Please do not make edits like this. -- ferret (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)