User talk:Esben Krag Hansen

Welcome!

Hello Esben Krag Hansen and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Scrum (development), seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —me_and 14:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Libby norman (talk) 23:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Esben Krag Hansen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise

Hello Esben Krag Hansen. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Scrumwise".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise

Hello Esben Krag Hansen. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Scrumwise".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scrumwise}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to Comparison of Scrum software appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Please see also WP:COI. Apparently you have a "conflict of interest" that should be transparently disclosed. GermanJoe (talk) 07:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GermanJoe: This list as it is is extremely incomplete and does not give any meaningful overview of the available tools. There are something like 20 widely used tools in this category. I'm not the right person to add all of the other tools, but I know enough about Scrumwise to add it. This tool definitely deserves to be on this list (look at the customer list on Scrumwise's website). If you don't think so, the entire list should be deleted instead, since it doesn't serve its purpose in its currents state. Esben Krag Hansen (talk) 08:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Esben Krag Hansen, such lists are restricted to already-existing Wikipedia articles that are based on multiple independent sources. Assuming from your username, you might have a "conflict of interest" and should read WP:COI first. Wikipedia is not a venue to promote products or companies, but to provide neutral information about "notable" topics, based on independent reliable sources. Please see also WP:GNG for Wikipedia's notability criteria and WP:WTAF for additional advice about list inclusion. I hope these links are helpful. If you have further questions, please feel free to post at WP:Teahouse to get additional advice from other editors. GermanJoe (talk) 08:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]