Jump to content

User talk:ErwinsMoggie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, ErwinsMoggie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Addison2008 (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum Aspects of Life

[edit]

Hello. Since Wikipedia article titles call for lower case in article titles except where there's a special reason to capitalize, I moved Quantum Aspects of Life (Book) to Quantum Aspects of Life (book). Then it occurred to me that the qualifying phrase "(book)" should be there only if it needs to be distinguished from another article titled quantum aspects of life or Quantum Aspects of Life. No such article now exists, so the question is whether one ought to. If there ought to be such a thing, probably it should have lower-case letters in the title, so the one with capitals wouldn't need the qualifying phrase "(book)". Therefore I will move this again. If you click on "what links here" you will find article that link to that one, and they will initially pass through a redirect page. Can you help fix the links, bypassing the redirect? Thanks. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Also please note: A section title should not say See Also, with a capital A; it should say See also, with lower case. See WP:MOS. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:QAL book cover.jpg}

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:QAL book cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]