User talk:Eru Rōraito

This is Eru Rōraito's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storsoløya (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tatupiplu was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storsoløya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Storsoløya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tatupiplu'^talk 16:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hdiddan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tatupiplu'^talk 16:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Hdiddan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Pahunkat (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reporting that user at UAA :-) Pahunkat (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion has been duly noted

Re [1]:

You shouldn't reply to AIAV reports on the AIAV page. Everything on that page gets quickly deleted, often within minutes, so your opinion will most likely never be read. The talk page of the reporting user is a good place to comment.

There is no requirement to notify or warn vandalism-only accounts reported at AIAV. You appear to have confused the WP:AIAV rules with the WP:ANI rules. New spam-only and vandalism-only accounts may be blocked without warning. Example: [2], Nazmul8129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).

Please try to only warn other editors about violating actual policies and guidelines, and avoid warning other editors about violating policies and guidelines that you just made up.

The edits in question ([3], [4]) were most certainly vandalism. A drive and a driver are two quite different things.

Might I suggest that you, and editor with 371 edits who has been editing Wikipedia for 32 days, should not be lecturing an editor who has made 55,647 edits and has been here for 14 years? --Guy Macon (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i was an IP (on itwiki) since 2004, so I only know the itwiki policies...:@Guy Macon:--Ḥdiddān 06:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for letting me know so I don't treat you like a newbie.

I don't know whether the rules are different on itwki, but on enwiki there is no requirement to notify or warn vandalism-only accounts reported at AIAV and DBN and AGF do not apply to such users. If a new user has only posted spam or only vandalized, you just report them and they get blocked without warning.

So it is never appropriate to tell someone reporting a vandalism-only account "the user has not been notified". Again, you were mistaken in thinking that notification was required. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank you@Guy Macon:--Ḥdiddān 20:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Storsoløya

Hello, Eru Rōraito. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Storsoløya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Storsoløya

Hello, Eru Rōraito. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Storsoløya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 17:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]