User talk:Erowe33

Pyramid power

Please note that Wikipedia's standard response to people who persist in trying to insert pseudoscience into articles is to block them from editing. Either discuss it on the article talk page, after reading Wikipedia:Reliable sources, or take this nonsense somewhere else. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And while you are at it, read Wikipedia:Edit warring. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking it to the talk page - I have moved your comment to the bottom of of the page, where new threads normally go, and added a signature (see Wikipedia:Signatures). I will respond there shortly. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for the promotion of fringe theories. If you do not stop edit warring, you will be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, note that you already appear to have broken the 3 revert rule. Consider the above as final warning - on Wikipedia, collaboration is required. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia

Hello, I have noticed your recent editing and user page. I would just like correct a few misconceptions about Wikipedia: Interested in clear, unbiased debate. Believer that every opinion has two sides. The WP:GEVAL policy makes clear that ideas and opinions are not all equal and should not be presented as having equal validity. A reading of WP:NPOV, WP:PSCI and WP:RS will also show that Wikipedia must present the mainstream academic view like those of reliable sources (and their bias). Happy editing, —Paleo Neonate – 01:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]