User talk:Erock789

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Naya Rivera, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kesha, you may be blocked from editing. TwoTwoHello (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kesha. TwoTwoHello (talk) 17:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erock789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was this account blocked? Erock789 (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't need us to tell you why you were blocked. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may not remove prior declined requests while blocked, per WP:BLANKING. You may make a new request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]