User talk:Ernesto parot

September 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Death of Savita Halappanavar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 10:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Death of Savita Halappanavar, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Death of Savita Halappanavar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Death of Savita Halappanavar, you may be blocked from editing. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 09:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bias information

This piece has been edited three times and each time it’s returned back to the original . I have added factual information into the piece to honour the young woman who lost her life . Although I each time it has been edited out and taken down . Savita tragically died from sepsis as a result of hospital negligence which was covered up with a push for the right to an abortion , which in this case could be of no use to Savita as her pregnancy had already expired . Savita needed a dilate and evacuation procedure but that was left unnoticed.RIP SAVITA Ernesto parot (talk) 10:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Savita needed a dilate and evacuation procedure but that was left unnoticed."

Yes, but that's effectively the same procedure as an abortion, which is why the hospital wouldn't perform it, which is why she got sepsis, which is why she died. 68.229.74.121 (talk) 14:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]