User talk:Erldenmile

Welcome!

Hello, Erldenmile, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. JarrahTree 10:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Normally

Your edit on Northam would be reverted because in its current state - WP:OR - what you need to do is to learn to WP:CITE and WP:LINK

Find some WP:RS and look at other articles to see how it is done - the use of Trove also helps. JarrahTree 10:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of things you need to learn

National archives file number means nothing to an online encyclopedia - you need a link!

although a lot of article look like it - WP:NOTGALLERY

keep at it - it is all a learning process!!! JarrahTree 13:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please learn

to WP:CITE and WP:RS using trove - Trove - the edits have a better chance of surviving scrutiny:-

for example:

Units of the Royal Australian Air Force - A Concise History – Vol 6 - Logistics Units

http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/21069773?q=units+royal+australian+air&c=book&sort=holdings+desc&_=1489053984920&versionId=42809752

which gives: - Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Historical Section (1995), Logistics units, AGPS Press, ISBN 978-0-644-42798-2

Hope that helps JarrahTree 10:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NP

It all takes time and you are doing well

probably next is how to WP:SIGN :)

cheers JarrahTree 00:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Please help me with uploading photographs.

Erldenmile (talk) 06:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK - next - you need to go to commons - as you have registered your username here

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Welcome

you should have a global name - so you go there and slowly go through the materials

take care

try https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps

if you get stuck try

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JarrahTree ( i am not much there at various times but will answer)

take note

if they are not yours - they have to be old to get through the hoops

if they are yours - go slowly and one at a time

never expect an easy go first off

JarrahTree 06:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting and punctuation

Hello, in your edits to Townsville, Charters Towers, etc., the text you added does not c ontain a full stop before the ref; also, references should not have spaces bfore them. See this edit of mine as an example that I've fixed; I've also fixed a ew others. Could you please do the rest? Thanks. Graham87 07:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will fix.

please remember to sign every time JarrahTree 07:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

another hoop

when you develop a locations main article - well worth comparing with other regional towns

geraldton, bunbury, albany, kalgoorlie - and so on - all the better if you know the towns/cities as well - and try to get a feel of what an online encylopedia article should have

some articles suffer from very serious WP:UNDUE where something is over-done and other parts hardly anything

photo galleries too big, too many lists and no links to other articles, too detailed local info with no WP:RS

it takes time - but one thing in your advantage to date - Northam - was an important locatio9n in ww2!

I have worked on info about army camps in other locations in the AWM and NA in Canberra, and NA in Perth - and yes if you are able to increase the info from WP:RS about country towns in the 2nd ww - great!!!

nungarin was the biggest by far location - and strategically important - any help with improving the quality of refs there would be appreciated JarrahTree 07:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

another

[1] - is not a ref - it is a link to a search - you need another stage into the ref for it to be considered a WP:RS - there should be a unique id for it to work as a RS JarrahTree 08:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

also

if you need to talk on wiki and ask for help re milhist issues:

for main over-view

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_Australia_during_World_War_II

for australian issues

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board

it is worth building up items on your watchlist to keep tab of things going on JarrahTree 10:59, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northam, Western Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muresk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Referencing your text

I suggest you use the citation templates provided, rather than trying to make it up as you go. It removes any chances of error. John beta (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Keep on truckin'!

	Fearless assault on military topics while under heavy attack
	Great work and you are clearly getting better as you learn some of the many things you need to know when contributing to Wikipedia. Don't be afraid to ask for help, we are all here to make a better encyclopedia! Kerry (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Hello Kerry, how do you create/upload a new page from sandbox? I want to create a page for the RAAF IAFD's across Australia.

Could you assist, please?

Cheers

There are really two aspects to your question. The first is the purely mechanical process of moving (aka renaming) your sandbox into an article. This is done going to your sandbox (read mode, not edit mode). Then choose Move from the tabs at the top of the screen (it may be hiding under the More dropdown list if you can't immediately see it). Then you choose Article from the drop-down and then type in the name of your new article in the text box. The "reason" would be "creating a new article". Then click "Move Article".

The second aspect is getting your article into better shape before moving it into the article. Looking at it, I think it is a list article and so I would suggest the name be something like List of RAAF inland aircraft fuel depots. Then you need to have an introductory paragraph that overviews the who/what/when/where/why of the article content. This paragraph should not assume too much prior knowledge of the reader (imagine your reader is a millenial in Iceland and their knowledge of Australia is limited to kangaroos). At the moment, your article commences somewhat abruptly and assumes the reader knows certain things. What is RAAF and USAAC (need to write them in full first time and introduce the abbrevation). "Where" is Australia and that needs to be mentioned. Although 1939 is the "when", it is not clear to me what the significance of the date is? Is it the commencement of WWII? If so, why were the Americans interested in fuel depots as they didn't enter the war until later. My quick read of the Northam article suggests that in 1939 it was only the Australians who were interested and that the Americans did some cost sharing but I would presume this cost sharing probably did not commence until later. I'd suggest maybe starting with "At the commencement of World War II in 1939, the Chief of the Air Staff of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) identified a need to lay down stocks of aviation fuel across Australia for the purpose of defending Australia. A committee was established to determine their locations and the design of the storage facility (or whatever it was they did)." Also I don't understand what you are trying to do with those templates which are red-linked; tell me and I'll make some suggestions. Kerry (talk) 06:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a list article I've been working on List of sugar mills in Queensland which might give you some ideas. The individual fuel depots probably have similar kinds of information that you might want to present: state, town/suburb/locality name, coords, info about the date of construction, storage capacity, their current status (still operational, decommissioned on DATE, destroyed on DATE), and a photo (and whatever else matters for fuel depots). This suggests to me that you may want a table. Now tables are AWFUL things to do in the source editor (and I see that is what you are using) but very easy in the Visual Editor. Can I suggest you enable the Visual Editor and use its Insert > Table function to create tables in a similar way to Microsoft Word? To enable the VE, go to Preferences (top right of screen), then the Editing tab, then make sure that "Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta" is NOT ticked, and that the "Editing mode" dropdown is "show me both editor tabs", then SAVE (bottom left). Now you should see "edit" and "edit source" at the top of articles allowing you to use either the Visual Editor ("edit") or the source editor ("edit source"). I find doing "ordinary" editing of article content is easiest done in the Visual Editor (see Wikipedia:VisualEditor/User guide. Kerry (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I won't pretend to understand the edit that another user just did to your sandbox. It didn't seem very helpful. I would be inclined to revert it and then move that previous version into "main space", i.e. a "real" article. If you are not confident about doing these, let me know here and I will do it. Kerry (talk) 06:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, could you revert it and move it in to "main space", please?

Once the article is in main space, I would suggest going to the articles about thhe towns/districts where the fuel depots were established and add a sentence or two with citation about the particular fuel depot in that place, probably in their History section. E.g. in Ballarat, there is already a sentence commencing "During World War II an expanded Ballarat airport was ...". I would be included to follow that with something along the lines of "Also in 1942, the RAAF established an inland fuel depot at Ballarat to be used in the defence of Australian against a Japanese invasion; it was decommissioned in 1944.[citation]".

Good idea, will look at this.

Obviously more citations would help the article but I think it's in good enough shape to move it into mainspace. Kerry (talk) 06:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You will find it at List of RAAF inland aircraft fuel depots. I tidied up a few things up and added your photo of the Northam one. I see you had already added a mention of the fuel depot in the Ballarat article so I added a link from that to the List article (which means the List article is not an orphan any more). Kerry (talk) 01:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have already added mention of the fuel depots in all the town articles, so I updated them all with a link to List of RAAF inland aircraft fuel depots instead of just a link to RAAF. Kerry (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks excellent, thank you. Erldenmile (talk) 03:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have also listed your new article at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge see number 213 in the Article archievements section. I hope you don't mind. The goal is 5000 new articles or significantly expanded of existing articles. Kerry (talk) 04:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I am about to update List of RAAF installations for Western Australia as well.

Also how do you create a new sandbox?

Erldenmile (talk) 04:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox is still there. It's just got an instruction in it to redirect to the List article you created (this is a normal consequence of a move action).

go to your sandbox: User:Erldenmile/sandbox
you should now be at your List article but just below the title you should see the words "(Redirected from User:Erldenmile/sandbox)".
Click on the sandbox there and this is a "non-redirecting" action and you will now be at your sandbox
Click on Edit and you should see

#REDIRECT [[List of RAAF inland aircraft fuel depots]]

The first line is the redirection which means anyone trying to read this page in "normal" mode will be taken to your List page. The second line is just a message explaining that this redirection is a consequence of the move action which created your List article.

just delete those lines in the sandbox, Save, and it will be a fresh new empty sandbox ready for your next article Kerry (talk) 08:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

referencing at chidlow

Not sure what all of that is all about above - for the Chidlow entry: -

http://www.ozatwar.com/ozatwar/militarycamps.htm was not the correct reference for the chidlow,
http://www.ozatwar.com/locations/chidlowsarmycamp.htm is the correct link - also note that it is highly derivative of

McKenzie-Smith, G (1994), The ebb and flow of the Australian Army in Western Australia, 1941 to 1945, Grimwade Publications, ISBN 978-0-646-17768-7

but also note - even if you are quoting from a book or a website - try to not copy directly from the item as there can be a copyright issue

also offering help, hopefully is not seen as attack - always take care - there is always more than one way of looking at how wikipedia works JarrahTree 05:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

also see that WP:OR relates to edit [2] you need to have a WP:CITE or WP:RS for the addition of the information.

and also that using ozatwar - it is not a very good item to be considered as a reliable source as it is highly derivative with no further referencing... where at all possible try a corroborative item on Trove. JarrahTree 06:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you picked one that is not so easy to get away with, I co-researched a project with McKenzie Smith on those sites :) JarrahTree 22:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thing about Chidlow - 2 things - first Melbourne HQ had planned the site one way, then the 1942 scare and everything went different, and Barrett escapes from Singapore and comes in takes over western command, and decides on dispersing troops and facilities throughout the wheatbelt - and large standing camps are no longer in fashion - and the result is the camp - completed in most in 1943 - simply becomes a staging post of a range of movements - of various sets of troops - your original quote from the ozatwar is ok - if you are able to link items - then also add mckenzie smith

there is very little on trove about chidlow it was meant to be secret - "Radios At Disposals Auction". Sunday Times (Perth). No. 2499. Western Australia. 13 January 1946. p. 2. Retrieved 21 March 2017 – via National Library of Australia. - in most cases it is mentioned after the war... JarrahTree 23:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that

When you want to say Thank you, or anything else on talk pages - please try to add WP:SIGN.

The thing about chidlow, is that ozatwar - he is taking info directly from mckenzie smiths work, and not saying which book or where. In that case, it is better to join the ref inside a footnote bracket ozatwar - chidlow, however see also forgotten armies - sorry I dont have the page number to hand... JarrahTree 09:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My main aim has been is to raise the awareness of Northam's military history and have been assisting Graham in one of his latest projects.

Thank you - Erldenmile (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I am meeting up with him next week ! after a very long time ... The forgotten histories is something we should cite more, it gives the article I have in draft form at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JarrahTree/Graham_McKenzie_Smith - it needs more WP:RS - third party cites about his work - I forgot he has an OAM as well now... must find a ref for that - and it will be up as an article before I see him. Please email me sometime, I am due to be in Northam in April/May - it would be good to catch up !! JarrahTree 09:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

	First article
	Great to see your first article! Keep on contributing! Kerry (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations also from me - this is a great article, on a fascinating subject. Nick-D (talk) 09:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Erldenmile (talk) 23:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok

once we get past that above, the small problem is that WP:MOS does not have allowance for external links to be linked from text direct, or in most cases galleries of photos.

so in effect your collection/list/gallery are effectively a separate article, with the ext links are citations/refs rather than embedded in text.

The full exploration of this (and ramifications of some of grahams work and how it is best translated into wikipedia material) would be much better in real life - if you dont want to email - I will let you know here when I am next in northam here - it might be in the next few weeks JarrahTree 02:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Weston, Billiard champion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leonora. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Erldenmile (talk) 23:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More skill than luck!

	Cue-dos for you!
	Great to see your 2nd article. I have added it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge as entry no 220 (hope that 's OK). Kerry (talk) 21:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you. Erldenmile (talk) 23:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you assist in moving my latest article 'US NAVAL AMMUNITION DEPOT (7 NAD) SPRINGHILL, NEAR NORTHAM' from my sandbox, please? Erldenmile (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I took the liberty of adding some headings and links and replacing your gallery with inline photos (as per Wikipedia:Image use policy#Image galleries). I added a couple of categories (but I am not a military history expert and others may be able to do a better job of categorisation). One thing that is needed and I suspect you know since you took photographs is to provide the geo-coordinates of the site. The easiest way to do this is to go to Google Maps, put it in satellite mode and then scroll around until you see the spot and then click on it and Google Maps will pop-up a little window with the coordinates which you can copy (4 decimal places is plenty). I have added approximate coords (based on Springhill) to the article (look at the *bottom* of the article when in edit, even though the coords are displayed at the top of the article when you read it) so if you could update them to be more accurate, that would be great. (DONE). When you have done that, also remove the comment about them being approximate only. Keep up the good work! Kerry (talk) 03:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of other things. I think the article title is not the most useful to the international reader who probably has never heard of Springhill nor Northam. I would be inclined to suggest US Naval ammunition Depot (7 NAD), Western Australia as a better title.(HOW?) Also, you say the location was chosen because of the distance to the coast but it was not clear to me whether you meant because it was close or far from the coast? (ALTERED.) And why being close/far was beneficial. Again, perhaps something obvious to the military historian, but perhaps not so obvious for the average reader. Kerry (talk) 04:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- See bolded above. Otherwise looks good! Erldenmile (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'HOW'? Go to the article. Click on Move on your normal (not edit) toolbar (it may be hiding under the More submenu - depends on your screen width). Provide the new name for the article (it will display the old name, so it is easy to make small changes to the name without re-typing. Reason: Western Australia is better known. Click MOVE PAGE. If it doesn't work, let me know. Kerry (talk) 06:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ka-boom!

	Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition
	Congratulations on your new article! It's listed as #228 at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge. Kerry (talk) 04:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] Thank again. Erldenmile (talk) 05:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sheesh

I cannot keep up with the sort of stuff above - now the article is in main space a lot of disambig issues arise - they should show up as orange coloured words, they require fixing up with disambiguation JarrahTree 06:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the dabs (dabsolver is my friend). Aside, they only show as orange links if you are using the disambiguation gadget. Kerry (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

regardless of whether you get help from Kerry or anyone else - it is always worth checking links to clarify they do not need a dismbiguation or not JarrahTree 07:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

edgeways

Please email me, thanks. JarrahTree 07:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also some material in the supply article is repeating what is already in either the Western_Australian_emergency_of_March_1942 article as well as the Fremantle submarine base article - we try not to repeat info between articles - and a very basic rule is to see what is already in other articles, rather than try to make an article stand alone with info - it should link to other articles that can qualify on the detail. JarrahTree 07:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I wasn't aware of Western_Australian_emergency_of_March_1942. I can amend if you require? Erldenmile (talk) 23:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please email if possible, otherwise leave the article as is for the moment, if that is ok with you, thanks JarrahTree 00:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

problem with historic photos on Commons

It seems some of your uploaded photos were deleted from Wikimedia Commons, see [3]. Glancing at the file names suggests to me that they are all pre-1955 photos taken in Australia and hence should be public domain in Australia and hence acceptable to Wikimedia Commons. However, like most new contributors, I am guessing you didn't know how to say that in a way that the folks at Wikimedia Commons understand.

When you upload a pre-1955 photo taken in Australia, you need to do the following on the first screen after you have uploaded the file itself.

Select "This file is not my own work" (assuming here that it isn't).

Fill in the source, which is wherever you found the photo, from a family album, from the local historical society, whatever. Hopefully NOT from a copyright source as that complicates the situation.

Fill in the authors, that is, who took the photo. If you don't know (and this is often the case with older photos), just say "Unidentified").

Then you get to the bit that starts with "Now tell us why you are sure you have the right to publish this work:"

Click on "Another reason not mentioned above". Then in the textbox below write exactly this

which is the magic incantation that asserts that the photo is within the public domain in Australia. Then NEXT etc.

If you have any problems, let me know. Kerry (talk) 03:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, unfortunately a message did flip in and out of the talk page, but it didn't remain for me to respond; I just couldn't find it. I was going to justify the upload for years past, ranging from 69 years (1948) to 121 years (1896) and thus in the public domain. I do respect matters of copyright, but I did upload the items in good faith. I have taken note of your advice above for future uploads. Tks. Erldenmile (talk) 08:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you were doing anything wrong wrt to copyright, it's just that the only way to do it so that Commons realises this is to follow the instructions above. I had most of my early photo uploads deleted for the same reasons; I was in the right copyright-wise but I didn't know the necessary magic words to express the licensing correctly. It's the way Wikipedia likes to welcome its new users :-( Kerry (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ammunition Storage Sites in Australia

Hello, could you have a look at my article in my sandbox, please? Let me know what you think.

Tks Erldenmile (talk) 02:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the references need to be cited in-line (note it is easy to reuse a citation as I suspect you will need to). If you use the source-editor, then one use of the reference is done as

<ref name=SomeNameGoesHere> usual reference blah blah blah </ref>

and then any other use is simply written as

where that slash at the end is significant. If you use multiple space-separated words for SomeNameGoesHere, then you need to use double quotes, e.g.

It does not matter whether the one that actually carries the reference appears first in the article; any one of them can carry the rference so long as all of them use the same name.

If you add a Notes field to the tables, you could put your citations there.

Obviously a lot of the place names can be wikilinked. Even if they don't have an article, create the wikilink anyway (red links are invitations to write articles, not to be avoided).

More generally, the article is (to this non-military historian) a bit uninformative. OK, I understand from the introduction that Australia needed to store ammunition. But for the individual items in the tables, it's a bit uninformative. Are we able to say (perhaps in the Notes field mentioned above) a little more about what was stored there, was it army/navy/airforce and which nation (I note you have indicated a bit of this information in the first column), and why it was there (when we write for Wikipedia, we are story tellers). Now my special topic is Queensland and I happen to know why Wallangarra, Queensland had ammunition stored there, but alas you are not telling me as the reader. Wallangarra is on the Queensland-New South Wales border. The Wallangarra railway station has two platforms, one for the Queensland rail gauge and one for the NSW rail gauge, and this is where passengers and freight were moved between Qld and NSW trains. By storing ammunition there (a place that I assume has no military significance otherwise), it could be sent north or south very easily. Today we have NSW gauge running into Brisbane but not back in WW2. OK. that's the little story about Wallangarra. What's the little story for the other places? I am guessing the Charters Towers ammunition had something to do with Charters Towers Airport#World War II etc. It should be possible to tell some stories that wikilink into other Wikipedia articles discussing the relevant war or whatever events caused that ammunition dump to exist.

I am actually wondering if we want a lot of tables one per state (as currently) or whether it would be better to have the "state" and "command" as fields in the columns in the table and break the tables up by commencement year/period. My reason for suggesting this links to the story-telling. The reasons we established ammunition dumps in the 1800s is probably quite a different story to why we created them in WW2 and that a single event/decision lead to the establishment of multiple dumps. For example, I am guessing many of the ammunition dumps established in 1942 were linked to the arrival of Douglas MacArthur and his US forces and establishing air bases etc in Northern Australia and they mostly closed in 1945 because the Japanese surrended. If you break it up along the lines I am suggesting, you can tell a bit of a story about the events and then add the table that relates to the ammunition dumps that were been created in response to those events. Then tell the next bit of the story and then present the table for the next one. And so on. The Notes field can be used to tell the story of individual dumps (e.g. Wallangarra) when there is something interesting to say about specific sites. Kerry (talk) 04:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geo-coordinates would make a nice field too (where known). Kerry (talk) 04:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Weston (billiards), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Longton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

important

look at other articles about former significant railway stations - dont take advice from others without actually seeing how the articles work (or dont) - also as a self checking device - try checking for links (at the start of the article) - but never repeat a link - that means WP:SEAOFBLUE - I had asked you some time ago if you could try emailing, it would be very useful if you could - thanks JarrahTree 00:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

in the sandbox you are making a lot of claims for the history of northam, either find WP:RS cites or leave it out - !!! JarrahTree 00:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your email contact is...? I have added a few photos to the article. Erldenmile (talk) 06:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Erldenmile. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Erldenmile. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]