User talk:NNoxius

Edit warring

DO NOT engaged in an edit warring as done on German Air Force article. You are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users'. If they're certain changes you want to make, then do them individually, as opposed to reverting the entire article. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FOX 52 ^talk! 03:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you are being serious, as the thing you accuse me of is exactly what you have engaged in, in the mentioned article. You reverted my entire edit because "breaks creates issues on with smaller screens", instead of removing the breaks yourself and keeping correct information. You should take a good look at yourself reevaluate what you are doing on Wikipedia. --Erik Pirntke (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you get reverted it isn't just a case of wrong information, you changed up notes, & variants without any good reasoning. As a newbie you should know that here on Wikipedia, we follow certain guidelines & standards so the next time you get reverted, it's probably a reason behind it - Use the talk page's to discuss your concerns as opposed to constantly reverting the article. Introduction to Wikipedia can be helpful in editing on the site. - FOX 52 ^talk! 16:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Had you read the article and looked at my changes, you would have realized that all my changes have sources unlike the incorrect edits made by others. The reverts I have made are very justified, unlike yours in that article. I am very familiar with how Wikipedia works, as I am also active on multiple other Wikipedias. --Erik Pirntke (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The reverts I have made are very justified, unlike yours in that article" is exactly the response we don't want here @ Wikipedia - Not sure what Wiki's you've worked on, but your Northrop T-38, & T-6 Texan entries have no numbers or sources - Then you go overboard with, overciting WP:OVERCITE every other numbers entry, when one will suffice - Your use of parenthesis and the backslash is made a mess on the table. - FOX 52 ^talk! 03:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have yet to justify your reverts in the article. As there are no precise numbers of how many T-38 and T-6 are in use, I did not feel comfortable adding any. I'm not sure what you mean by "your use of parenthesis and the backslash is made a mess on the table", since you advised me not to use < hr > and slashes and parenthesis were what was used before. You may have noticed that sources of variants can differ, which is why I chose to add sources to every variant, even if the source is the same. According to WP:OVERCITE: "It is not necessary to include a citation for each individual consecutive sentence, as this is overkill. This does not apply to lists or tables". --Erik Pirntke (talk) 10:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]