User talk:Ericxedge

Ericxedge, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Ericxedge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ericxedge, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) Don 00:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) Don 15:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KoshVorlon. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. "....We are all Kosh...." <-Babylon-5-> 19:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WDWNewsToday

I reverted you because you've placed an advertisement on Wikipedia. Advertisements are not allowed at all. You can re-write your article less like an add and it won't be touched by me. KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ... 20:09, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An advertisement for what??

WDWNewsToday (redux)

I see you're back working on that article. It's a bit better this time, you have references on the top of the article up to the episode guide. That's a great start! You'll want to re-write the episode guide, it really looks like a promo or an ad. Perhaps if you summaraize instead of quoting. For example. Here's your version:

Episode	Description
258 & 259 (9/23/12)	Join me, Tom Corless, and a cast including Justin Heyman, David Smith, Jason Diffendal, Zach Larson, Scott Smith, and Anthony Yacullo for a variety show dedicated to the Walt Disney World Resort and its many fans. Plenty of Walt Disney World information and fun awaits you on this edition of the WDW News Today Podcast! On this week’s show, we begin with your Walt Disney World Resort News and Rumor Report. In this HUGE report we discuss the opening dates for New Fantasyland at the Magic Kingdom, the replacement of “The Magic, The Memories, and You” with a new nighttime show, and the gigantic rumor of an earth shattering expansion at Disney’s Hollywood Studios, among a number of topics. We follow that up with two segments in our countdown of the 30 Biggest Moments in the History of Epcot as we chip away into numbers 10, 9, 8, & 7 on the list as we get ever closer to the 30th anniversary of the park.

If you summarize it it would become something like:

Episode	Description
258 & 259 (9/23/12)	Tom Corless and cast, Justin Heyman, and co-hosts David Smith, Jason Diffendahl, Zach Larson, Scott Smith and Anthony Yacullo discuss opening dates for New Fantasyland at the Magic Kingdom, a new nighttime show "The Magic, The Memories, and You" and a number of additional topics...

This is because advertising or promotion isn't allowed on Wikipedia. As this guideline explains. I actually do have a few articles on Wikipedia at the moment, so I've already been where you are. I haven't deleted or blanked any part of your article, as you've actually improved it, but do change the episode guides into summaries rather than what looks like verbatim copy from the show. It looks less promotional. KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ... 16:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC) _{in addition, please sign your posts by typing ~~~~ at the end of your posts.[reply]
KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ... 16:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC)}[reply]

--- Thanks was looking at ease of completing the task. Will begin working on it.Ericxedge (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work on your #253. Try to make the rest of the tables look the same way (more like summary ). KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ... 19:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jorgecarleitao (talk) 16:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 20:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ericxedge. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, Ericxedge. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 08:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI) 16:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday

Hello Ericxedge. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "WDWNewsToday".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WDWNewsToday}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WDWNewsToday (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There's no inherited notability from anything or anyone else, and there's no exceptions with this Draft, and because it's only known for the park itself, it's best mentioned at the park's own article instead, as this is not notable in Wikipedia policy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WDWNewsToday and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]