Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. RobJ198102:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
11 pieces of trivia for Tron is more than enough to justify the trivia tag. The tag has every right to be placed, without discussion first. Wikipedia isn't a guide to every little note: it's an encyclopedia. Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles isn't a made up guideline, it's an official Wikipedia guideline. Also: when posting on talk pages... post on the bottom, not the top, since that's the proper way to do it. RobJ198105:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you feel that 11 pieces of trivia is too much? If you think that information could be better placed, then instead of cluttering the page, maybe you should spend some time by reworking it. Just because you don't think the info is useful doesn't mean is isn't valuable to someone else. I'm not complaining about the philosophy of the tag as I am about the fact that you're adding unnecessary clutter to pages where it is not necessary. I'd rather see info than some tag telling me that I'm looking at too many trivia items. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericpaulson (talk • contribs)
Maintenance tags are important for editors. It lets people know it needs cleanup and so on. I don't know much about Tron, so I can't just easily clean it up. I think 11 is too much, because it's a long list of clutter. Look at featured articles (or good articles even), and you will see they don't have long lists of trivia. If the article is going to be improved, a trivia section needs to be smaller or just gone completely. Trivia sections aren't banned, they just shouldn't be so big. RobJ198122:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Dave Della Terza, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Philippe03:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Della Terza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. B.Rossow · talk17:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
