User talk:Ericmcglashing

Speedy deletion of Nesuite Integrator

A tag has been placed on Nesuite Integrator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 22:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Vigilant Office

A tag has been placed on Vigilant Office requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 22:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't recreate an article, such as Vigilant Office, which has been deleted because it fails Wikipedia's WP:CORP guideline. If you disagree with the deletion, you can list it at WP:DRV for an undeletion discussion. Corvus cornix_talk 22:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Vigilant Office, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 22:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Vigilant Office. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 22:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

The recent edit you made to Vigilant Office constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 22:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vigilant Office has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vigilant Office

A tag has been placed on Vigilant Office, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Spiesr (talk) 15:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Vigilant Office, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. That means we only have articles on notable subjects. For companies, the notability standards are at WP:CORP. Also, notability must be shown by reliable independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't blank user pages in revenge, like you did to User:NawlinWiki. It doesn't help to make your article any more notable. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]