User talk:Ericawrites1313

This is Ericawrites1313's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heidi Hutner (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your submission looks very much like a promotional tool to sell the figure to the readers. Read WP:NPOV for impartiality in tone. Moreover, Insufficient sources. Cite third party sources: mainstream publications, newspapers, magazines or books. Stay away from homepages and official websites. For referencing, it is a must to have in-depth coverage, with extensive reporting about her: one full article about her.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heidi Hutner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Heidi Hutner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 15:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ericawrites1313! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 15:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heidi Hutner (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Since she does not get a pass on academic rank she has to pass on being an author. That means we need better independant coverage of her work. WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heidi Hutner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Heidi Hutner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Papadakos (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dorothy Papadakos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dorothy Papadakos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 16:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dorothy Papadakos has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dorothy Papadakos. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Papadakos (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still reads like an ad. Please remove all embedded links (e.g. what is there for "Pro Organo label"). Also please cut this article in length by about 50%. All content that remains should appear in the linked sources. (That is, say NOTHING that does not appear in the sources.) I'm not sure that Papadakos qualifies for an article -- see WP:NMUSIC -- but it is very difficult to tell given the state of this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dorothy Papadakos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dorothy Papadakos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Papadakos article

Hi Ericawrites1313, perhaps you remember me as the OTRS agent who handled the licensing back in May for this photo by Kendall Fuqua.

Anyway, I noticed that the draft article about her is languishing at AFC, so I thought I'd pitch in to help. Here's a major rewrite I did in my user workspace today: see this Draft.

I know you've put a lot of time and effort into drafting an article, and I certainly don't want to come across as an interloper, so it's up to you as to whether or not you'd like me to go ahead and move my rewrite to Wikipedia Mainspace. If not, and you prefer to continue working on your draft at AFC, please feel free to use my version for help.‎ JGHowes ^talk 22:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done, see Talk:Dorothy Papadakos. Also, made this "Did you know?" nomination for the Main Page (below). JGHowes ^talk 16:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know... that Dorothy Papadakos, the first female organist‎ at New York's Cathedral of St John the Divine, wrote a musical portraying Roman life ‎in ancient Pompeii when it was destroyed by the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius?‎ source: "'Pompeii' & Circumstance", Wilmington (NC) Star News

Created by JGHowes (talk) and Ericawrites1313 (talk). Nominated by JGHowes (talk) at 20:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Papadakos (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Dorothy Papadakos instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dorothy Papadakos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dorothy Papadakos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Dorothy Papadakos

Hello! Your submission of Dorothy Papadakos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dorothy Papadakos

On 20 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dorothy Papadakos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dorothy Papadakos, the first female organist at New York's Cathedral of Saint John the Divine, wrote a musical portraying Roman life in ancient Pompeii when it was destroyed by the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dorothy Papadakos. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dorothy Papadakos), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious: where did you find the date of birth? It would need a reliable source to have it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ericawrites1313. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page The Safina Center, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Heidi Hutner concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Heidi Hutner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Heidi Hutner

Hello, Ericawrites1313. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heidi Hutner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]