User talk:Eric Justice I

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Justice I (August 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a social media. Please see WP:NOT.

Qcne (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eric Justice I! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Eric Justice I

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Eric Justice I, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 20:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Eric Justice I. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Justice

Fair and just Eric Justice I (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Eric Justice I. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two you’s paradox

The two you's paradox is when you do a time reversal; you have two you's. There is a past you and a present you. The past you has memories up until the present time. The present you has memories and experiences that occurred after the point where you encounter the past you. Eric Justice I (talk) 22:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If we were to consider a hypothetical scenario involving time travel where you encounter a past version of yourself, there would likely be several key differences between the "past you" and the "present you." Here are some potential distinctions:

Memories and Experiences:

Past You: The past you would have memories and experiences up until the point in time where you encounter them. They would not have any knowledge of events or experiences that occurred after that point.

Present You: You would have all the memories and experiences that you've accumulated up until the present moment, which includes events that happened after the point where you encounter the past you.

Knowledge and Information:

Past You: The past you would only be aware of information and knowledge available up until their last moment in time.

Present You: You would have knowledge and information about events, discoveries, and experiences that occurred after the point where you encounter the past you.

Physical Condition and Appearance:

Past You: Depending on the time gap, there may be physical differences due to aging, changes in health, or personal choices (e.g., hairstyle, clothing).

Present You: You would be in the physical state that you're currently in.

Emotional and Psychological State:

Past You: The past you might have different emotional and psychological states based on the experiences and circumstances up until that point.

Present You: You would be experiencing emotions and thoughts based on your current situation and experiences.

Knowledge of the Future:

Past You: The past you would not have any knowledge of future events or developments that occurred after their last moment in time.

Present You: You would be aware of events that have occurred after the point where you encounter the past you.

Interactions and Decisions:

Past You: The past you would have made decisions and taken actions based on their knowledge and circumstances up until their last moment.

Present You: You would be making decisions and taking actions based on your knowledge and the current circumstances.

Remember, this scenario is purely hypothetical and has not been demonstrated in reality. Eric Justice I (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum mechanics

TBD Eric Justice I (talk) 06:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two You's Paradox (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two You's Paradox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Axis of time have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Two You's Paradox

Hello, Eric Justice I. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Two You's Paradox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Two You's Paradox

Hello, Eric Justice I. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Two You's Paradox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Annh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Amazon (company) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Annh07 (talk) 23:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]