User talk:Erianna

This user may have left Wikipedia. Erianna has not edited Wikipedia since February 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

1

Garibaldi Eccles Cake story

I laughed and laughed when I read that - thank you for posting it. What a shame there is no space in Wikipedia for things that ought to be true. I was a documentary film maker for 10 years and a colleague at the BBC once said to me "Never let an awkward fact get in the way of a good story."

I did wonder for a while about setting up an alternative wikipedia that has articles in it which ought to be true but aren't. Hugh Mason (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm confused. For posting what and where? Erianna (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aha my turn to apologize - while browsing the article 'Garibaldi Biscuit' I misread the history. I thought you had added the story below, which is too good to be true but made me laugh anyway:

The ancient story of the Garibaldi is also well documented in the British media. It is said that Giuseppe Garibaldi, whilst on his travels to the popular market town of Leeds in 1861, came across the young Englishman Gordon Bennett, who offered him the quintessential English treat - the Eccles cake. Unfortunately, prior to eating his cake he was sidetracked by a sudden bowel movement and had to leave his cake unattended. Upon his return, Garibaldi had no idea where he had left his item of confectionary. Disappointed and forlorn, he plopped himself on a nearby chair, feeling an odd squishing sensation spread through his behind - he had indeed sat on the Eccles cake, thus creating the Garibaldi biscuit. Hugh Mason (talk) 22:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add edit summaries

I know the edit summary will often be longer than the edits you make, but it saves time for everyone looking for vandalism when a logged-in user includes one. Use the short abbreviations like ce, wk, etc. if you prefer, but anything is better than nothing. (From a fellow WikiGnome) Mark Hurd (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join Stanford's Wikiproject!

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Stanford University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

ralphamale (talk) 22:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Erianna. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Erianna. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Erianna. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]