User talk:EriFr
Welcome
[edit]Hello, EriFr, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- PBS (talk) 17:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Hastings
[edit]Hastings does appear to use the Krivosheev figures. His claim of 352475 total casualties is straight from Krivosheev's work, but with the Polish casualties not included:
- Soviet losses in the “Berlin offensive operation” 16 Apr. – 8 May according to Krivosheev: 78.291 KIA/MIA, 274.184 WIA, total 352.475. Add Polish losses: 2.825 KIA and 6.067 WIA.
However, while the Krivosheev data says 78,291 KIA/MIA, Hastings somehow comes up with a figure of >100,000. I'm not sure how he did this math, and until someone can account for it, his figures should be left out.96.238.16.143 (talk) 14:33, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, the edit conflict seems to have been resolved for now with some footnote and journal digging on my part. Take a look at the discussion. We seem to have established a high and low range for estimated deaths. Hastings and other tertiary sources have been moved to the footnotes, and Muller is now listed as a "german" estimate due to the book series that he wrote for being commissioned by the Military History Research Office of the Bundeswehr. -Megakedar (talk) 02:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the work you have done. Very interesting discussion, it took me my whole breakfast reading it! Best regards /Erik EriFr (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, the edit conflict seems to have been resolved for now with some footnote and journal digging on my part. Take a look at the discussion. We seem to have established a high and low range for estimated deaths. Hastings and other tertiary sources have been moved to the footnotes, and Muller is now listed as a "german" estimate due to the book series that he wrote for being commissioned by the Military History Research Office of the Bundeswehr. -Megakedar (talk) 02:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Average attendance
[edit]Sorry EriFr, I will do that. I didn't realise you had made so many other edits, my mistake. I did read the article and I think it makes clear that it is all matches not just league. there were also the Spanish Super Cup and Joan Gamper games at the Camp Nou. Thanks Adam4267 (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot mate!
- Doesn't the article say that the average for the whole season (all games included) was 75,825? So, which games does the 75,158 represent? La Liga, Spanish Supercup and Joan Gamper?
- Best regards /Erik
May 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RB Leipzig may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ] out of the first round of the [[DFB-Pokal|DFB-Pokal]], beating them with 3-2 after a [hat-trick]] by [[Daniel Frahn]]. They were eliminated in the next round by [[FC Augsburg]] (0:1).
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RB Leipzig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Bull Salzburg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RB Leipzig may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ". It is an formerly known [[Eastgermany|Eastgerman]] town. The [[VFB Leipzig]] (re-established as [[1. FC Lokomotive Leipzig) is being dismissed as non [[socialist]] soccer club. The [[Deutscher
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
RB Leipzig
[edit]Hi, sorry to bother you but I need some advice for the RB leipzig article. As you maybe already noticed, this user Nikebrand had an edit war with me, in which as a result I also was blocked from editing, because of contents in it. It seems like it gonna be going over like that again, where he wont let me edit his edits, even though I think I am just correcting it without changing any meaning and removing unsourced and unrelated contents.
Could I have your opinion how I should handle this situation? Thanks. MbahGondrong (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for contacting me! I am very concerned about this user Nikebrand. Sometimes he adds valuable information, but unfortunately his edits are very often (1) far from objective, (2) lacking sources and (3) not written in proper English (normally the language is not a problem, as other users can help him with this). It appears to me that Nikebrand is a German citizen, I therefore find it interesting that he does not make any edits to the German article on RB Leipzig. Why is he so obsessed with the English article? I do not know what advice I should give you, as I am not familiar enough with the rules and sanctions of Wikipedia, but I think you are doing a good job. You got my full support. I will continue to keep an eye on Nikebrand, and I will not hesitate to undo or edit his edits when it is necessary for the reasons I mentioned above. Best regards /Erik EriFr (talk) 12:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- I see you live in Dortmund. I just want to make sure that I am not misunderstood. When I wrote that it is interesting that Nikebrand does not make edits on the German article on RB Leipzig, I did not mean that German citizens should not edit English articles. That would have been counterproductive and hypocrite, as I am not English myself (I am Swedish). I meant that I think his behavior is suspicious. I see that the German article is much more developed, and has many more editors. Perhaps he has given up on the German article to focus on the English article, were he believes he can impose his own views and perspectives without meeting resistance from other editors? EriFr (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- As this is Wikipedia, we need to recognize his right to contribute (I know that you already knows this), and I think some of the information that he adds is valuable. But I think we need to keep an eye on him, and I will help you with this. This is the only thing that I can suggest at this moment, as I do not know what appropriate sanctions that Wikipedia has for him, or how they should be invoked.
- EriFr (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your replies. It seems like he only revert my edits and not other editors, that I dont understand. Anyway hopefully we can make the article much more better with every contributions and correct any incorrect edits. Cheers!! MbahGondrong (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Apparently Nikebrand have been blocked from editing now. MbahGondrong (talk) 22:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stade Rennais F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FARE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RB Leipzig, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages DFB and DFL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Transfermarkt
[edit]Please do not cite transfermarkt in articles, as you did with RB Leipzig. Since most of its content is user-generated, it is not a reliable source. More importantly, the source does not confirm the cost of a Bayern Munich membership, making the source not only unreliable but irrelevant to the claim made. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- My bad, thank you very much for the information, Sir Sputnik. I have now provided additional sources. Btw, if I want to send you a ping, as an example, to notify you that I have answered, did it work the way I did now? EriFr (talk) 19:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I need your help
[edit]Hi there. Could you please help me edit this page? Average attendances of European football clubs I saw that you have already worked on that article before so I'm sure you can edit it again in the proper way. I would have done it myself but i'm still new in wikipedia. Thanks ! Jallouljalloul (talk) 23:40, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I see that you're making a lot of efforts to help improve many articles on Wikipedia. So I wanted to give a star as a symbol of admiration. Jallouljalloul (talk) 23:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC) |
July 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Borussia Dortmund may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- (standing and seated) for league matches, and 65,829 seated spectators for international games.).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kicker.de/news/fussball/bundesliga/startseite/630989/artikel_
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 04:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
FDGB-Pokal
[edit]FDGB-Pokal. Can you help improving this page, and the missing seasons with "red links". There are not so many left.Thanks!--Alexiulian25 (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Alexiulian25: Thank you for contacting me! Unfortunately, I am unable to help you at present. I am currently working on improving the article on RB Leipzig. My list of things to do is still long, and it seems like I'm the only one working with the article (we seem to be in the same situation here), so I do not feel I have the time to also work on other articles. I am sorry. Maybe I can help you later, otherwise, my advice to you is: set a goal for a number of seasons to improve each day or each week. Be nice to yourself, do not feel stressed, I made that mistake with the article on RB Leipzig. Remember that Wikipedia is meant to be interesting and fun. We are looking forward towards a long winter with many evenenings and nights to spend working on our articles. :) Kindest regards /Erik, Sweden
I did read your article and it seems really good and complete. I do not know what you can add more in it (just to update it). Some pages here on Wikipedia (football related pages) are very complete and other many pages are "red links".--Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RB Leipzig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadion der Freundschaft. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 22 March
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the RB Leipzig page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Regionalliga Nordost
[edit]I figured that was the case that's why I made sure I left detailed edit summaries to explain. As it is the title race in the Nordost is extremely tight, the tightest in any of the four top divisions in Germany this year, it appears. Calistemon (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leipzig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Bull Arena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, EriFr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Linking
[edit]OVERLINKing is when a common term or major geographic region is linked in an article where the subject is not immediately associated with the subject. A REPEATLINK is where the subject is linked more than once. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Thank you for taking time to explain this to me! Kindest /EriFr (talk) 08:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of stadiums under construction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brühl. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
European theatre of World War II
[edit]Vuzz88 keeps on making edits without explenation and upon undoing, coninues to do so in the European theatre of World War II page. I wonder if thr user owns the IP 178.222.124.193, since a day before that IP made similar edits of which Vuzz88 is trying to revert to. Could you help adress this? Thanks. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- @108.54.93.183: Thank you for notifying me! I will watch this page, and check every edit he or she makes. /EriFr (talk) 15:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. Thank you! 108.54.93.183 (talk) 15:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, EriFr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Friuli-Venezia Giulia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Illyria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, EriFr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SG Dynamo Berlin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Brittany
[edit]hello i changed many elements in 2 paragraphs about Brittany and its history because the article contained many wrong informations, including a fifth department in Brittany (that doesn't includes it since 1790 ...) this article is based on an old translation of a polemic french wikipedia article
If you need more details, you can check data on the official website of the french region https://www.bretagne.bzh
you can also check informations on "google.com and you'll discover maps or texts describing Brittany https://www.google.com/search?q=r%C3%A9gion+bretagne&oq=r%C3%A9gion+bretagne&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2591j0j7
hope this could help you Best regards --Philippe Le Roux (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- User@Philippe Le Roux:
- Hello
- Thank you for sending me a message!
- However, I do not agree with you.
- The sentence in question said that the historical province of Brittany was split into five departments, which as far as I know is correct. The information on Bretagne.bzh says: "Lors de la nuit du 4 août 1789, les privilèges de la Bretagne, «province réputée étrangère», sont abolis, en particulier son Parlement ; la Bretagne est divisée en 5 départements en 1790.".
- Maybe we should have this discussion on the Talk page instead? I think it is an important issue.
- Kindest
really soory I don't have time for the moment to talk of these different aspects it's easier for me to let you change the history Philippe Le Roux (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- User@Philippe Le Roux:
- Ok, I understand! But when you find time again, please share your views on the Talk page! That would be very interesting! Then we could develope the article together.
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sportforum Hohenschönhausen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DFB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dynamo Dresden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Unity Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for May 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Refuge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Union Berlin
[edit]Hey, thanks for reaching out. But everytime they play here in Germany "Sky" or even the newspapers always refer to them as "Union Berlin" and not "1. FC Union Berlin". And yeah, it is about the common name, which is as i said Union Berlin. Kante4 (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doping (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiegel.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Angela Merkel Stasi
[edit]Why do you keep removing Angela Merkel from the Stasi page when a source is quoted which shows her involvement with that organisation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.170.96.234 (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- @81.170.96.234:
- Hi! Because your source is not credible and does not even support your claim. Please see the talk page, let us discuss the issue there. Kindest regard /EriFr (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Football in Berlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry for State Security.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SG Dynamo Hohenschönhausen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint-Pol-Roux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Blum and Christian Beck.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bouncer.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Berliner FC Dynamo (1989–2004), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1. FC Frankfurt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry for State Security.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sports club (East Germany), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSG Chemie Leipzig.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Rudolf Hellmann moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Rudolf Hellmann, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Rudolf Hellmann for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolf Hellmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Curbon7 (talk) 01:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Curbon7: Thank you for the notification! Kindest. /EriFr (talk) 09:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for translating the Rudolf Hellmann article! Just checking that you know about the Template:Translated page talk page template? I suspected that's where some of the text of the article came from but it doesn't say that on the talk page or in any of the edit summaries, and it should. -- asilvering (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Asilvering: Hi! I had no idea about that template, I have only seen Template:Expand language so far. Thank you for sharing this information! German Wikipedia do not always use a lot of inline citations, but instead general references, which are listed under litterature, or similar. That is quite a challenge when transaling. The template is very useful here! I have also translated Sportclub (DDR) into Sports club (East Germany) (however, I have also added a lot of other sourced content to the article). I will immediately add the template there! Thank you! Kindest. /EriFr (talk)
Creating this set off a couple of triggers, self published blog, etc. but the thing that caught me offguard was the tags. Was this translated from another language Wiki? If it was, you must give attribution ASAP on an edit, with the link in the summary. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Dennis Brown: Hi! Thank you for contacting me directly. No, it is not translated. It only exists on English Wiki. It comes from this article: History of Berliner FC Dynamo (1954–1989) (check this version: [1]). However, I have just expanded the section that covers the era 1966–1978, so I figured it was better to put the sections that cover the era 1978–1989 in a separate article. I plan to start working on an expansion of the history of the era 1978-1988 (the "Golden era") anytime soon. I will move the article History of Berliner FC Dynamo (1954–1989) to "History of Berliner FC Dynamo (1954–1978)". Kindest regards. /EriFr (talk) 22:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- If it contains any text from that article, you still need to give attribution, via Creative Commons license that we use. Just make an edit with the summary "This article has text taken from (wikilink to article)" to comply with the license. I know, it sounds odd to attribute when it came from here, but the license requires it. It's better to catch it now, early on, than later. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Dennis Brown: I did one edit. Could you please check if I attributed correctly? Kinest regards. /EriFr (talk) 23:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- That should be perfectly fine. We just need the chain of edits to point back to the people that did the edits. Otherwise, a year later, someone catches it, reports it as "copyright infringement" and people get overly excited. It's just habit for me, I do compilation articles, and lift paragraphs and sources from other articles, automatically give attribution. Really, even if it is just a source and a couple of words. Better safe than sorry. But again, that looks fine. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Dennis Brown: I did one edit. Could you please check if I attributed correctly? Kinest regards. /EriFr (talk) 23:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
References
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oldenburg.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mike Werner, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 13:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please also see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players for the correct layout and formatting of the honours section of footballer articles. Robby.is.on (talk) 13:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notifying me! Please check the article now. I gave it a new try! Kindest regards. /EriFr (talk) 21:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Great work. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notifying me! Please check the article now. I gave it a new try! Kindest regards. /EriFr (talk) 21:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Berliner FC Dynamo (2004–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oldenburg.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Berliner FC Dynamo (2004–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Beck.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 30
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Próżna Street, Warsaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Śródmieście.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Berliner FC Dynamo (1989–2004), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Berliner FC Dynamo (1978–1989), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welt.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Olympiastadion, Michael Blum and Letterbox company.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sportforum Hohenschönhausen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weißensee.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 28
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Värmland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunne.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bernd Schulz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berliner FC Dynamo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Beck.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)