User talk:Eretif

Welcome!

Hi Eretif! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 17:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I have info that would be helpful but I am new to this process Eretif (talk) 17:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Caroline Durieux, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have reference but do i have to renter text Eretif (talk) 18:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't add your own opinion or statements which don't have references to Caroline Durieux. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 15:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see your comments. It would be helpful to know the opinion you're referencing.

I admit that I don't always reference right away

Thanks Eretif (talk) 15:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Unsourced info: for example, the three paragraphs starting "Durieux was born into a mixed religion marriage", which look like original research; the paragraph starting "In late December 1920, Caroline returns"; the one starting "In 2018 the Hermes parade included a float titled Caroline Durieux"; the three paragraphs starting "The art exhibitions being sent to Mexico", which include what looks like opinion ("What started out as a tone deaf good intention ... ") and the four paragraphs headed Innovation.Tacyarg (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sources for all of those comments some of which come from oral history with artist. They will be posted within days. Thanks for your comments Eretif (talk) 16:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your reply. I'm wondering if you know or represent the subject of the article. I will post the conflict of interest guidance on this page in case it is relevant. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see WP:SELFCITE. Tacyarg (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Eretif. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Caroline Durieux, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 16:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I appreciate all your comments but I hope you have also noticed how robust the page has grown in terms of references and further readings. Yes, I knew the subject well but my interest in filling to her already existing page was prompted because I am preparing papers for a donation to Archives of American Art. In asking for papers they suggested that it may take two years for info to be available for research. I thought I would make some of my info available on your reference page.

In many ways I respect the care you ask of your contributors. Kudos.

However, you talk about conflicts of interest and you extol the value of sourcing. Yet it is often the case that folks writing a book or chapter is indeed a friend of the subject about whom they write. Caroline has been dead for 34 years; I am 80. My only interest is giving people doing research to have access to data. Currently, I am working with a Yale scholar on her dissertation on Durieux. That frequently happens.

I want to make a contribution so that future scholars can have access.

Thanks Eretif (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick Mershimer (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Galobtter was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frederick Mershimer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eretif! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick Mershimer (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frederick Mershimer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Frederick Mershimer

Hello, Eretif. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frederick Mershimer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Frederick Mershimer

Hello, Eretif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frederick Mershimer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]