User talk:Erencexor

OK

Speedy deletion nomination of Cybex Shell

A tag has been placed on Cybex Shell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Adi4094 (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cybex Shell

A tag has been placed on Cybex Shell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Looking at the history of your talk page you have had CSD notices placed on your page 27 times. I highly suggest you take a break from creating articles Ridernyc (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wipeer

A tag has been placed on Wipeer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 08:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for For repeatedly creating inappropriate pages including copyright violations and spam. I encourage you to read through the site policies and contribute constructively on the expiration of your block.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. –SpacemanSpiff 08:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:GeForce series mGPUs

I have nominated Category:GeForce series mGPUs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. uKER (talk) 07:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wordpress internet forum plugins

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wordpress internet forum plugins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 05:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Wordpress internet forum plugins, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Do not remove speedy deletion tags on pages you created. AstroCog (talk) 04:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wordpress internet forum plugins

The article Wordpress internet forum plugins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

how-to guide with no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:48, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of Internet forum software (WordPress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of Internet forum software (WordPress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Internet forum software (WordPress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AstroCog (talk) 12:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Backup P2P - Secured peer-to-peer backup

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Backup P2P - Secured peer-to-peer backup, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://p2pbackupsmile.sourceforge.net.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 05:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Backup P2P - Secured peer-to-peer backup

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Backup P2P - Secured peer-to-peer backup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NTox · talk 06:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Command Comparison

The article Command Comparison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:notability. Unsourced. Wikipedia is not a manual.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 11:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent unconstructive editing, including creation of numerous unsuitable articles. You have been creating unsuitable articles since 2006, and show no sign of learning what is acceptable on Wikipedia. Your creations have included articles on subjects which show no sign of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, articles which have been unambiguous promotion, articles which have been unambiguous copyright infringements, etc. You have received numerous messages about these issues over the years, but have never made any attempt to respond to them, and two short blocks have done nothing whatever to discourage you from persisting in the same way. Other edits, apart from article creation, have frequently been unconstructive.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HyperCam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HyperCam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HyperCam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RJaguar3 | u | t 21:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ffx3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ffx3. Since you had some involvement with the Ffx3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ff-x3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ff-x3. Since you had some involvement with the Ff-x3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy X3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Final Fantasy X3. Since you had some involvement with the Final Fantasy X3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ps3 lite listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ps3 lite. Since you had some involvement with the Ps3 lite redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 06:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]