User talk:Eratomsen454

This is Eratomsen454's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Winkler (Violinist) (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Winkler (Violinist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alexander Winkler (Violinist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬 14:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eratomsen454! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Amkgp 💬 14:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Winkler (Violinist) (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Winkler (Violinist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alexander Winkler (Violinist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Winkler (violinist) (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Blogsites (such as WordPress) are not reliable or acceptable sources, neither are social media websites, such as Youtube, Instagram and Spotify.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Winkler (violinist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alexander Winkler (violinist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Winkler (Violinist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alexander Winkler (Violinist), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As a reminder WP:COI and WP:PAID editors must go through the AFC process. Praxidicae (talk) 13:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello Eratomsen454. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Eratomsen454. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Eratomsen454|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 13:34, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move Draft:Alexander Winkler to article space again

Hi, Eratomsen454. You write here about users being investigated by administrators. I'm an administrator, and I watch Praxidicae's talkpage. I was taken aback to see your hostile attacks on an experienced user who has been nothing but pleasant to you, so I did look into the matter. I can see that your page Alexander Winkler (violinist) has been moved to draftspace and you have been given information about why: it's not ready for article space, as your references do not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Please see the information, from three different users, in the yellow fields above. After this, you moved it back to article space. Please don't do that again. Incidentally, also please stop moving the spelling "violinist", which is correct according to Wikipedia's spelling conventions, to "Violinist", which is not. You risk being sanctioned for disruptive editing if you move the article again into article space before it's ready (currently it's full of unreliable sources, such as Wordpress, which you were told about in the "old notification" you removed), and generally ignore information and good advice. We also have a civility policy that you're supposed to follow. Just be polite and assume good faith, please.

I also have a question: you write "I have had articles denied many times" at User talk:Praxidicae. This account, User:Eratomsen454, was only created a week ago, so what "denied" articles are you referring to? I don't see any in your contributions. Do you have more accounts than this one? Bishonen | tålk 14:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, I have not moved the article back to mainspace after the recent incident. Eratomsen454 (talk) 14:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That does not answer Bishonen's question, Eratomsen454. El_C 14:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I could not answer the question before, it seems that it was added in later. I have had an account before from 2015 but I created this account because the other one had a wrong email. Eratomsen454 (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not added in later. Having a "wrong e-mail" is not a very good reason to create a new account. It's a reason to change your e-mail in your preferences. May I ask what your previous account was? Bishonen | tålk 15:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Eratomsen454, we need a straightforward way to establish your account/s history as representing, you, the person. El_C 15:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the previous account had a business email. I was not aware that one could change the email. Anyway, I don't really enjoy being ridiculed as a private person about my private life so I think I'm going to go away from the computer now. I have a concert tomorow so, i need to practice :) Eratomsen454 (talk) 15:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eratomsen454, no one is ridiculing you. We are doing are due diligence. Yet you continue to fail naming the previous account/s, still? El_C 15:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that removing your comment from my talk page doesn't change that you said it. Also do not remove conversations from others talk pages, especially when they've been responded to. Praxidicae (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Eratomsen454, that is not okay. Please don't do that again. El_C 16:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Alexander Winkler

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Alexander Winkler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Eratomsen454. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, Whatever just delete it. Eratomsen454 (talk) 12:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]