User talk:Epwikieditor

September 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Pérez (radiation oncologist), you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 00:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no promotional or advertising material in the latest version of the article.

Please specify. Please...show me the advertising material.

Also, please explain why you insist on reverting to versions of the article that contain factual errors. Do you not care if Wikipedia publishes articles that are not accurate?

I assure you, if you continue with this belligerent behavior, I will not rest. Epwikieditor (talk) 01:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Carlos Pérez (radiation oncologist). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. OutsideNormality (talk) 01:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Carlos Pérez (radiation oncologist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 01:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simple questions, BBB23:

What are the factual errors in my last version you object to?

Please be specific.

Where do you believe that there is "advertising"?

Please be specific.

Other than your subjective and unsupported characterization of edits you don't like as "unconstructive," what specific claims, facts, or representations lead you to repeatedly revert to versions that have inaccurate facts?

Please be specific.

I am not in an "editing war." You repeatedly revert to inaccurate versions of the article about Dr. Perez.

Why?

Please be specific. Epwikieditor (talk) 01:42, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More simply: Since you say that we should be focused on *content*...please, specify what CONTENT you find problematic, and explain why. Please be specific.

You've never given examples or references. Not once. I look forward to your specific responses. Epwikieditor (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Epwikieditor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Carlos Pérez (radiation oncologist), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 00:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Epwikieditor reported by User:Bbb23 (Result: ). Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]