User talk:Epmeade

March 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina), from its old location at User:Epmeade/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina) (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is no evidence the church is notable, because none ofll the references are independent.

The detail of the presentation of the current services and activities of the church are non-encyclopedic--they would be of interest only to parishioners or prospective parishioners -- such content is considered promotional

Try an article perhaps 1/5 the size of this one, with inclusion of true independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epmeade! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 22:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina) (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the organization, focusing on what the organization says about itself. Corporate notability or organization notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every organization, and not every organization with 501(c)(3) status (or its equivalent in other countries) is notable, and this draft does not establish organizational notability. You may ask for advice about organizational notability at the Teahouse.

This draft is both about the building and about the parish. The information about the parish (the church) contains too much detail and reads like a brochure about the church, but Wikipedia is not a travel guide.

Also, because this draft is about two topics, it is difficult to evaluate whether it establishes notability about either, but a Wikipedia article should be about one topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Church of the Good Shepherd (Raleigh, North Carolina). Thanks! Antan O 21:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of social fraternities and sororities

Alpha Phi Omega is not a social fraternity. The co-ed groups listed there are co-ed groups which are social fraternity/sororities. Alpha Phi Omega is listed at Service fraternities and sororities. Thank you for the membership and chapter update on the PFA page. YiLFSNaraht (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]