User talk:Epcott

Picture

Hi, I'm the one who deleted the picture. As long as it's ok from a copyright perspective I have no problem with either the picture or its inclusion in the article. It was a mistake to delete it. I'm sorry. Please feel free to reinsert it.Osli73 (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Image:Belgrade Kosovo is serbia protest Obraz flag Karadzic portrait.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Belgrade Kosovo is serbia protest Obraz flag Karadzic portrait.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Belgrade Kosovo is serbia protest Obraz flag Karadzic portrait.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Belgrade Kosovo is serbia protest Obraz flag Karadzic portrait.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please, when you edit, especially when you edit contentious articles, always use an edit summary giving a precise description of what you are doing. On Kosovo, I gave a warning the other day that I would be blocking people who fail to observe this. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dmitry Rogozin and Ratko Mladić in Sarajevo - January 1996.png

Thank you for uploading File:Dmitry Rogozin and Ratko Mladić in Sarajevo - January 1996.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]