User talk:Epalaveeva
Nomination of Artefact (company) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artefact (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artefact (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
The article VICIS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A highly promotional article that consists of sections: "VICIS in the Media"; "Founders"; "Management"; "Backers"; etc. Coverage consists of PR-driven, future-looking or local coverage, not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Epalaveeva whose other contributions have an appearance of being promotionally driven and extensively edited by various SPA-like accounts.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)