User talk:Ep9206

Welcome!

Hello, Ep9206, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 19:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lamech

I did that so that whether they are the same individual or different, they can be discussed on one page. I think "Lamech" is the best title for the article, and have requested an admin move it. It seems like you are more concerned with the wording at the intro implying they are the same individual; I was not responsible for that, but I'll reword it so it makes it clearer what the distinctions are.--Cúchullain ^t/c 00:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page is moved to Lamech now, and I have rephrased the intro. I hope you find it less objectionable now.--Cúchullain ^t/c 03:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the move. Somehow, a lot of the original article is still missing. That includes reference to even a third Lamech, in Mormon tradition. Perhaps it's time to fish out some of the old article that disappeared in early July. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ep9206 (talk • contribs)

I didn't see that anything was missing; the Mormon stuff is still there at the end. But the page histories are now merged, so you can check and make sure. --Cúchullain ^t/c 22:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lutheran Church—Hong Kong Synod

I see you try your best in writing the page , Lutheran Church—Hong Kong Synod. However, there are too many Chinese words which are not needed in the article. So I will remove the address of the churches written in Chinese from the article.

And Wikipedia is not the yellowpage. If we want to inform the reader by adding the websites about the contact numbers and the addresses of the church of "Lutheran Church—Hong Kong Synod". So I will remove them from the article. Shrimp wong 04:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Wikipedia is not the Yellowpages. This remains a troubling question because Yellowpages may be hard to find for certain people. You seem to have a kindred heart in developing this article. It would be nice to meet you in person some day.

Also unfortunate is that the official LCHKS website does not provide this directory information which is quite valuable to travellers and others who wish to do some research prior to their visit.

Perhaps the Chinese words can be moved over to a linked Chinese language article? That is my ambition as soon as I have time to do it.Ep9206 20:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the yellow page link to Hong Kong Church Web Page which provide this directory information. You can have a look to see if it is better. The List of the Church( in Chinese, some words are translated in English Shrimp wong 04:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Hong Kong Church Web Page works okay unless one's reading of Chinese is limited. Perhaps the redundancy of the Yellow Pages listing would be good for English language reading.Ep9206 19:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lutheran denominations

In response to your query on my talk page. I have been providing some organization to the Category:Lutheranism and its sub-cats as a part of the WikiProject Lutheranism. One thing that happens as articles are created is that they often wind up in a sub-cat and the parent category - I have tried to remove some of this redundancy. Thus, for example, I added Lutheran Church—Hong Kong Synod to the most descriptive and specific category - Category:International Lutheran Council members. The article was still in Category:Lutheran denominations, as the ILC cat is a sub cat of it. This is common practice. So for example, people are listed in "Lutheran clergy", which is a specific sub-cat of "Lutherans by profession" and thereby is included in Category:Lutherans. -- Pastordavid 18:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. What would happen to denominations that belong to both ILC and LWF? or to denominations that do not belong to any global church bodies? I am not convinced that this attempt to streamline categories, that are more descriptive or specific, actually works. In other words, this dichotomy of sub-cat's and parent categories may not actually work. I am in favor of "redundant" categorization if it is not a repetition.Ep9206 20:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denoms. in both LWF and ILC (there are very few) belong in both cats. There are many, many broader categories in which one could put such a denomination. Category:Christian denominations, Category:Christian group structuring, Category:Lutheranism, Category:Christianity, and Category:Protestantism come to mind. However, such broad categorization defeats the purpose of categorization altogether. Lutheran denominations which do not fall into either the ILC or the LWF belong in the Lutheran denomination category. I have asked another editor who does a significant amount of work with categorization to have a look at this discussion and weigh in. -- Pastordavid 23:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bold text

WikiProject Lutheranism

You are invited to participate in Lutheranism WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Lutheranism. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

Forbidden City - History

Hey, thanks for contributing to Forbidden City's history section. Just wanted to let you know - in case you haven't discovered it for yourself - that there is a main article on History of the Forbidden City. Under the "daughter article/summary style" system, the history section in the Forbidden City article should be a summary of that article. If you have new information, please consider adding it to the History article as well. Thanks again, --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 00:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also a friendly note that one of the sources you inserted, http://www.chinatownconnection.com/forbidden-city.htm, is actually a copy of an earlier version of the Wikipedia article. Cheers, --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 01:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

impossible translation?

There is a discussion going on whether the name of that German church body can be translated or not (it appears like this on the english pages of this church's homepage). One user changed the name of this Church (actually a federation of several Lutheran, United and Reformed churches) and it's regional member churches to the German form because he says their names can't get translated. so the article on the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Bavaria now appears under its German name because he says the "concept" can't be translated into English. Please go to the discusson page of the Evangelical Church in Germany and have your say --93.130.249.56 (talk) 02:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evangelical Lutheran Church - Synod of France (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evangelical Lutheran Church - Synod of France and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ep9206, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 04:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eglise Luthérienne Libre en Suisse (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eglise Luthérienne Libre en Suisse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ep9206. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evangelical Lutheran Church in Belgium (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evangelical Lutheran Church in Belgium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Evangelical Lutheran Church in Belgium, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 14:39, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Evangelical Lutheran Church - Synod of France concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Evangelical Lutheran Church - Synod of France, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eglise Luthérienne Libre en Suisse concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eglise Luthérienne Libre en Suisse, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Evangelical Lutheran Church - Synod of France

Hello, Ep9206. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Evangelical Lutheran Church - Synod of France".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eglise Luthérienne Libre en Suisse

Hello, Ep9206. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eglise Luthérienne Libre en Suisse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ep9206. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]