User talk:Eodcarl

Good luck

With what? I gave you advise. I didn't tell you anything I was going to do. I was trying to help you. There was literally nothing you could have told me good luck for. Perhaps you should have actually read my post. I was genuinely trying to be helpful.Farsight001 (talk) 06:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Two weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Doug Weller talk 06:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were editwarring across multiple articles despite a prior block and several 3rr warnings. Doug Weller talk 06:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eg 9 reverts here arguing that Nat Turner wasn't an African-American because he was a slave and thus not American. Doug Weller talk 07:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've reblocked for an indefinite period of time, as the bigotry and religious bias are simply too great for you to edit objectively here. You are not here to build an encyclopedia, but instead to push a religion down the collective throats of other editors. We welcome all religions and beliefs here, but that also requires tolerance of those who don't share your beliefs, and obviously you do not have that. I have revoked talk page access as well, you should direct any appeal to WP:UTRS. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 14:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been changed to indefinite following a discussion and consensus at WP:ANI. The relevant thread is here. Doug Weller talk 14:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well now, that's almost too funny for words. Between the time I saved the permanent url and went back to ANI to close the discussion, ~~Eodcarl had edited logged out calling someone a "militant atheist fa9got"~~. The correct link is now here. Doug Weller talk 14:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wrong, that was User:Til Eulenspiegel complaining that he was being pinged at ANI. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eodcarl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]