User talk:EoRdE6/Archives/2014/October

Reference Errors on 2 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Xbox page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Kim Gyu-ri

My edits were NOT vandalism.

1) I added more information to her filmography, as translated from the Korean Wikipedia: [1]

2) I added two article references from 2 Korean sources (since I couldn't find English references that cite her).

3) I corrected the romanizations in the infobox, as seen in: Kim (Korean surname), Moon (Korean name), Seon (Korean name).

203.215.116.1 (talk) 00:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, it must have been a false positive on my vandalism checker. Feel free to reinstate the edits. EoRdE6 (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

NC Same Sex Marriage

Could you please provide your rationalisation for marking Same-sex marriage in North Carolina as out-of-date? It has been consistently updated to reflect ruling of the US Court System, and both lawsuits have been edited to that effect. --krimin_killr21(talk) 19:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

It is usually good practice to reply here and post a {{Talkback}} templete on my page. As to the substance of your comment, the first article was included several days ago, and the second article was being added by me when the tag was added. (It had only occurred a few hours before) I appreciate your willingness to contribute, however the use of the update tag was incorrect in this case. I hope you feel welcome to continue contributing in the future. --krimin_killr21(talk) 19:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Re:

So it's automatically unreliable if an unreliable source is involved at any point? ViperSnake151  Talk  21:18, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Please use a Talkback template in the future EoRdE6 (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Vectorization algorithms

I am sure that such section should exist in the article Vectorization (image tracing), but your comment to the undo is not appropriate. The content of this section should be different.
The comment of the previous editor 75.156.54.244 is reasonable: "Unfortunately, none of the algorithms linked to have anything to do with vectorisation".
I do not know what proof is needed, but googling for "Vectorization algorithms" does not show Robert's cross, Canny edge detection or Sobel operator. Indeed, those algorithms convert pixels to pixels. But the result of the true vectorization algorithm should be coordinates of interest points, lines, Bezier curves, triangles, circles or other shape primitives. --Wladik Derevianko (talk) 16:51, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) X the hamster (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. EoRdE6 (talk) 18:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

X_the_hamster

(Personal attack removed) X the hamster (talk)

Hello, I'm EoRdE6. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EoRdE6 (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) X the hamster (talk) 04:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm EoRdE6. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:EoRdE6. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. EoRdE6 (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)