User talk:Environ1561
Speedy deletion of IEST-RP-CC005.3: Gloves and Finger Cots Used in Cleanrooms and Other Controlled Environments
[edit]
A tag has been placed on IEST-RP-CC005.3: Gloves and Finger Cots Used in Cleanrooms and Other Controlled Environments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Olly150 15:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms
[edit]A tag has been placed on IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Olly150 15:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms
[edit]A tag has been placed on IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Olly150 15:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Deletion note
[edit]Since you dropped hangon templates on the talk pages for the above articles, I wanted to drop you a note as to why they were deleted anyway. I could see no reason why these three standards, out of the zillions of standards throughout the world, rose to the level of encyclopedic notability. Sorry. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 16:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
RE: Deletion Tags
[edit]I just noticed that the previous editor that commented on this page also questioned notability. My problem was; are these standards notable ENOUGH for their own article. I would suggest that these standards be amalgamated into the IEST page (which I didn't make any changes to - see page history. I obviously don't have a problem with documenting them, but I think it would better suit Wikipedia, if they were part of the main IEST article. Your pages for standards have very long (and awkward) titles. I recommend that you create a section on the IEST page for these standards. It would be more concise and easier accessed. It would also provide a better class of article. Thank you for your edits anyhow and if you need any advise, don't hestitate to ask me or any active editor. Olly150 20:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello Environ1561,
It seems to me that an article you worked on, IEST-STD-CC1246E, may be copied from http://www.cemag.us/news/2013/02/iest-revises-iest-std-cc1246e. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.
It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.
Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ISO 14644 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages HALT and HASS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://engineers.ihs.com/document/abstract/HEKEIBAAAAAAAAAA.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ISO/DIS 14644-1.2, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://engineers.ihs.com/document/abstract/JMJOIAAAAAAAAAAA.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:42, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
[edit]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you really want to put up the standards, I would recommend a list page containing all of them, maybe with a table containing name, description, and external link. There is no way each and every single one of the standards individually meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. --Richard Yin (talk) 16:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms
[edit]Hello Environ1561,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IEST-RP-CC006.3: Testing Cleanrooms for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of IEST-RP-CC005.4: Gloves and Finger Cots Used in Cleanrooms and Other Controlled Environments
[edit]Hello Environ1561,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IEST-RP-CC005.4: Gloves and Finger Cots Used in Cleanrooms and Other Controlled Environments for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ISO/DIS 14644-1.2
[edit]Hello Environ1561,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ISO/DIS 14644-1.2 for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ISO/DIS 14644-2.2
[edit]Hello Environ1561,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ISO/DIS 14644-2.2 for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright and notability
[edit]Please do not copy text that is copyright into Wikipedia. This is not allowed - please see WP:COPYVIO. You have also been told in the past that these standards are not of encyclopaedic note. I would ask you not to post any more of them, and would advise you that continuing to post them could be regarded as disruptive editing. Continued posting of copyright material can lead to blocking from editing. Peridon (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Environ1561. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Environ1561. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)