User talk:Enver Ottoman

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Enver Ottoman, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Enver Ottoman, good luck, and have fun. User:Significa liberdade (talk) 18:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avar-Kabardian campaign (1618) has been accepted

Avar-Kabardian campaign (1618), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of River Khabl (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Killarnee was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of River Khabl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Killarnee (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enver Ottoman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Killarnee (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Adji-Gozle (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

I can't verify that a book by a person named Allen titled "The Siege of the Caucuses" (source 5) even exists. I checked Worldcat, the Cambridge University Press (its purported publisher), and Google Books. The specific battle name "Battle of Adji-Gozle" returns zero sources in a search of JSTOR and Google Books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Adji-Gozle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 02:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Avar-Kabardian campaign (1618) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avar-Kabardian campaign (1618) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avar-Kabardian campaign (1618) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chetsford (talk) 02:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your article drafts

Hi Enver Ottoman. Please see this discussion regarding your article drafts. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks. Chetsford (talk) 03:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Attack of Nogais on Cossack Patrol (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possible WP:HOAX.

Source #4 cites a source ("Journal of Ethnographic Studies") with a non-existent DOI number. Moreover, I can't find any evidence a journal named "Journal of Ethnographic Studies" exists.

Sources #5 and #6 are already broken links, despite the fact this article was submitted in the last 24 hours.

I can't find evidence source #2 ("Nanais against Cossacks") exists after I run the name in Worldcat, however, this might be a translation of the original, Russian name of the volume.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Attack of Nogais on Cossack Patrol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 03:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Hi Enver Ottoman - I have blocked your account as a vandalism-only account. I have done this based on the fact that you have submitted multiple article drafts through WP:AFC that, at a very minimum, contain sources that are almost certainly fabricated. More likely, some (or all) of these articles are WP:HOAXs. For example:

In this draft [1], you included a reference to a website "militaryhistorycaucasus.org", however, a WHOIS search finds that no such domain name has been registered.
In the same article, you included a DOI to an article purportedly published in a Journal of Caucasian Studies, though no such DOI actually exists.
You included, as a reference, a thesis purportedly hosted by North-Caucasus Federal University, however, you used the wrong URL for that institution and -- generously assuming this was simply a typo -- did not use the correct directory syntax for where NCFU hosts their theses.
In this draft [2], you cite an article in volume 11, issue 3 by a James Forsyth in Central Asian Survey titled "A History of the Peoples of the Caucasus". However, not only is there no so-named article in that issue of Central Asian Survey, no article by a James Forsyth appears at all.
In the same draft you cite page 420 of The Russian Conquest of the Caucasus by Baddeley to support the statement "The Battle of Adji-Gozle took place in 1836 in the North Caucasus between the Russian forces commanded by General Alexander Veliaminov and the Chechen highlanders led by Imam Shamil" There has been only one printing of this book and page 420 does not contain the place name "Adji-Gozle", the date "1836", or the personal name "Alexander Veliaminov".

In these, and some other drafts, you have included references to offline texts with titles that do not appear in Worldcat or any other directory. You have cited journals the existence of which I can find no evidence.

Any of these, individually, might be a case of a simple formatting error or mistake. It is impossible for me to believe, however, that all of these mistakes happened in the same series of drafts written in close succession.
While you are no longer able to edit Wikipedia, I hope you will continue to participate in the Wikipedia project as a non-editing reader or as a supporter of the Wikimedia Foundation [3]. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia. Chetsford (talk) 05:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forest Clash of Tatars and Circassian (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Forest Clash of Tatars and Circassian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Battle of River Khabl

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Battle of River Khabl, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ahri Boy (talk) 07:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Battle of Khosrek (1820) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle of Khosrek (1820). Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 09:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Battle of Adji-Gozle

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Battle of Adji-Gozle, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ahri Boy (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Forest Clash of Tatars and Circassian

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Forest Clash of Tatars and Circassian, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Killarnee (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Paraul (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir MemeGod was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just looking up the titles of two of these references shows me that this draft is almost 100% a hoax.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Paraul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sir MemeGod  17:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Sadifan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadifan. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 20:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]