User talk:Entropy/Archive 4

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Entropy/Archive_4.

←Back to talk page for Entropy

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Distributed denial of service attacks on root nameservers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICMP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Fock state

Hi, exactly which part did you find non-constructive? If you kindly let me know on the talk page of Fock state, then I can answer your doubts. Indranil1993 (talk) 10:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think you've made a mistake, because, the edits I did were to make the page more informative and correct. The definition of Fock state was not correct in the page, I had to edit that (and to support the edits I gave reliable sources, you can look up to check or I can explain if you want). Then I added the sections Fermionic Fock states. You know, you haven't undid my edits on Bosonic Fock state. So, I think adding Fermionic Fock state was also required (here also I've added as many reliable sources I could find). Can you please confirm me, that these are the edits you really wanted to make? Indranil1993 (talk) 10:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why I trust Wikipedia

On the page User:Entropy/Why I trust Wikipedia, what do you think about changing this...

Articles about very specific or complex topics are often fitted with a template stating they are [[Category:Miscellaneous_articles_needing_expert_attention|in need of attention from an expert]].

by inserting a colon between [[ and "Category"? This will remove the page from the category listing. Iceblock (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, I've removed it from the category. —Entropy ^(talk) 04:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Iceblock (talk) 16:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heterosexuality

I added the informations that most humans are heterosexual and that's true. Gay or bisexual people are on the less side. Why isn't my contribution to this article accepted? Opo Chano (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you see the section later on that page called Behavioral studies, note the part that says "the majority of humans have had both heterosexual and homosexual experiences or sensations and are bisexual". But even that is beside the point; you added a potentially controversial, unsourced statement to the opening section of the page. I don't see that as constructive so I removed it. —Entropy ^(talk) 00:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but somehow I believe that it's a nonsense that there is a statement in this article that every human is bisexual in fact. I'll never feel attracted to humans who has the same gender as me for example. Opo Chano (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that your edit didn't contribute to the article, it just inserted an unsourced controversial statement, so I undid it. —Entropy ^(talk) 00:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Edits to List of Florida Gators football players in the NFL

Hi, I'd like to understand why you reverted my edits. The overwhelming majority of active and inactive players listed on this page have references to external pages corroborating their information. Why remove the references I added? Why not remove all of the references and not just the ones I added?

With regard to Will Hill and Janoris Jenkins, why did you delete the entries relating to their careers in the NFL? The information relating to them is exactly the purpose of this page as they are former players at the University of Florida who now play in the NFL.[1] [2]

With regard to Deonte Thompson, why did you change accurate information about his status relating to the Baltimore Ravens and Buffalo Bills back to inaccurate information? Thompson was with the Ravens from 2012-2014. Relegated to the Ravens' practice squad, he was signed by the Bills in December of 2014 and played one game for the Bills before the end of the season and remains with the Bills.[3] [4] Just because the information doesn't match his personal page doesn't make it wrong, especially in light of more authoritative sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAFLNHDC (talk • contribs) 00:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new at the whole wiki editing thing. Sorry if I mixed up some the edits by you and someone else. Thanks for looking into my comments though. Appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAFLNHDC (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Army CPL.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australian Army CPL.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Army LCPL.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australian Army LCPL.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Entropy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Entropy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]