User talk:Entrain

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome and encouraged to make contributions here, the modification you recently made to Haywards Heath constitutes a wholesale deletion of a section. Without further explanation (on the page's talk page, your edit will be considered vandalism. Please make an effort to discuss such changes before making them.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

You have engaged in an Edit War on the Haywards Heath page, in violation of Wikipedia policy. I encourage you and User_Talk:Jivebaby to engage in the approved Dispute Resolution process, rather than continue this dispute in the page itself.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Haywards Heath. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Haywards Heath, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.