Jump to content

User talk:Enrique Fernandez Escalante

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Enrique Fernandez Escalante! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.iah.org/recharge. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) (February 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sulfurboy, good morning. With the due respect I'd like to mention that the content of this post has been carefully written taking into consideration the five pillar of Wikipedia, with the whole intention of making broader the dissemination of MAR technique. It has taken years, it is not copied and pasted from any site. I´ve corrected the constraints you mentioned yesterday, including general references and citations from first row institutions in the matter, as you required, and modifying the writing style to be more encyclopedic. As it is an important post in water management, I´d kindly ask you to reconsider this abrupt decision. In case you have some demands for corrections I'm ready to keep working on it, because it is important for the MAR community. looking forward to hearing about your consideration, best regards Enrique