User talk:Enricokamasa

October 2009

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Johan Richter a different title by copying its content and pasting it into Johan Richter (painter). This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.

OK. Makes sense. It was very few lines but if there is any need for this in the future I will do it the way you describe. I have not done any cut and paste in the past. Enricokamasa (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Sainte-Maxime, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sainte Maxime

An English-language reference from a reliable source would be required, at the very least. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yule

When Swedes wish each other God Jul, they mean "Merry Christmas", not "Happy solstice". Any dictionary will tell you that julen, jul and the other Scandinavian cognates for "Yule" mean simply "Christmas". Very little is known about pre-Christian Yule, and there is no basis to think that it had anything to do with the solstice. "Secularized" is not the same as "neo-pagan". You don't have a source for any of the claims you are adding. Kauffner (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually YOU do not have any source to your statement. Ask ANY teacher in the Swedish langauge and they will agree to that there is no direct translation/correlation Jul vs. Christmas. "Kristi Mässa" would be the correct translation. I just checked with three reliable Swedish encyclopedias and they all refer to "Jul" as the pre-christianity name for - among other traditions - to celebrate the solstice and the making of "blot". When Swedes were Christened they retained the original name "Jul" and many of the traditions (like eating ham) while the birth of Jesus was injected as the reason for celebration. In the antics Dec 25th was the birthday of the God Mithra. There are lots of books re this subject in Swedish. One is "Språkliga intyg om hednisk gudatro i Sverge", Magnus Fredrik Lundgren from 1876. The Swedish museums have a lot of material both published and at their locations. --Enricokamasa (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comviq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NMT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liftbyggarna

The article Liftbyggarna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PROD, no significant coverage, etc

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 23:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liftbyggarna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liftbyggarna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liftbyggarna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Enricokamasa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Enricokamasa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]