User talk:Enr-v

hello, please be patient, my english is not perfect! --Enr-v 21:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear fuel cycle

Hi, I saw that you posted a comment that the pictures were not NPOV. Please could you say what you do not like about the pictures, and also say what pictures you think should be added to the page. Please reply on my talk page to make sure that I see any reply.Cadmium 11:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I will change the page to make the following different cycles clear

1. Once through cycle 2. Closed cycle using Pu and U recycle 3. Closed cycle using Pu, U and minor actinide recycle

BNFL are doing option 2, I am unsure if they are reusing U but they are making the Pu into MOX for reuse.

Have you any other points that you would like to raise ? (Reply again please on my talk page).Cadmium

You might be interested to know that in the US many utilitys are now using MOX (Pu supplied by the former Soviets), so MOX use has started (Which closes the cycle). Also research is being done on the use of minor actinides in fuel, it has reached the process development stage where normal reactors (Fast) are being loaded with test fuel. So the fuel cycle has been closed, and on the experimental stage it is closing for the transplutonium metals.Cadmium 17:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of Nuclear Waste Diagram

You asked for a translation of french diagram, and I can do it if you give me the translation of the texts in it as I don't speak english. --TigerTjäder 04:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a translated version at Image:SchémaDechetsNucleaires_en.svg. Both my French and my nuclear engineering are a bit rusty, but I think I got it more or less correct. Feel free to correct any mistakes, or let me know and I'll do it. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Atomic Mirror

A tag has been placed on Atomic Mirror requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]