Jump to content

User talk:Enlormn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome , new user

[edit]

Hello, Enlormn, I see you've made an edit to the encyclopaedia. You are most welcome. Here's a standard welcome box with lots of useful links. I hope you get pleasure from editing and making Wikipedia an even better resource for the community. If you have any questions about the project don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page here User_talk:Lumos3.

Happy editing,

Lumos3 (talk) 13:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC) , Wikipedia Welcoming Committee.[reply]


Hello, Enlormn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Lumos3 (talk) 13:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Free will/liberty

[edit]

Thanks, but free will is the theme, not liberty. hgilbert (talk) 13:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will assume you can back that up. Anyway, in case you didn't notice it, the page you reverted it to doesn't exist anymore, it's just a redirect. If you had read my edit note before just randomly reverting back anything done to your page you'd have noticed that I wasn't editing it randomly.
Thanks; I've fixed the link to go directly to free will. There is a citation for this passage of the article; it explains this in more detail. hgilbert (talk) 12:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Lands of Hope. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. The personal attack was done in the edit summary. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should have reported him for spam. He was in violation of WP:TAGBOMB Enlormn (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In my offense accidentally tagging an article twice is not a violation WP:TAGBOMB, nor is actual policy, but merely an essay. I apologize that two tags were placed instead of one, but that is not ground for calling me an idiot. --Teancum (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lands of Hope for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lands of Hope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lands of Hope until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Woodroar (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]