User talk:Engr Wasim Khan

November 2014

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Solenoid, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 17:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Guerillero | My Talk 20:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Engr Wasim Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a spam and will be careful the next time Engr Wasim Khan (talk) 19:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't get to link to our own websites on Wikipedia; every link you added was to a website you own. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

>

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Engr Wasim Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not always the case... lots of users do that... in addition, that links were related to those articles, and want to share with students for free.... moreover... you blocked me without prior notification or warning. if you sent me a warning notification, then i will have been remove all those links I think, there is no justice in Wikipedia. :( Engr Wasim Khan (talk) 2:42 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Engr Wasim Khan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you. After long time,I'm back to Wikipedia again and I understand that what I have did and blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead (When needed) Please give me a chance, I'm sure I will never disappoint the community. Thanks and best wishes. Engr Wasim Khan (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Request appears to have been withdrawn. User appears to want to vanish -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To confirm that you indeed understand the problem, please explain what exactly you will not continue to do. Please also explain what contributions you intend to make when unblocked. Huon (talk) 00:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. In short, I will not add inappropriate and spam links to the wiki Pages. And I'm not having a plan to add something new to Wikipedia due to strict policy. Also, You may delete my account if possible. Also delete all my links that I have added in the past (So sorry for that as I have made some troubles to the honest community as I was unaware in the past to do so as I was keen to share the free info around my students related to electrical engineering but I was wrong as I had been selected a wrong platform to do so)

Again thanks and best wishes.

wp:vanish

Please confirm that this is what you wish. Please follow the link to review what it entails.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]