User talk:Englishcanuck
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Canadian EMR, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.canadianemr.ca/index.aspx?type=about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Canadian EMR
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Canadian EMR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 21:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Canadian EMR
[edit]You can just create a new article at the same place. As long as it asserts notability, it shouldn't be speedied. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 19:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- The longer you spend here, the more you'll realize that this place is more complicated than you could possibly imagine. Still, we need some quality control - given how bad a lot of our articles are right now, can you imagine how bad they'd be if we let anyone do whatever they wanted? A few more points:
- Thank you for reacting as you did to the article's speedy deletion (learning the policies, asking about them when unclear, creating a new, sourced article, etc.). You'd be surprised at how many editors consider it a better idea to either re-create the same article until they're blocked or yell at the deleting admin about how this band is huge in the Melbourne underground scene, which the admin would know if he didn't have his head so far up his ass, and what gives him the right to decide what does and doesn't get deleted.
- To be honest, I still think this article is borderline to survive a WP:AFD if it was ever nominated, but it would certainly have a chance. And it's no longer speedy-able, anyway. If new media coverage, etc., ever comes up about this, it would probably be a good idea to add it to the article to further assert notability.
- Lastly, I'm not sure whether or not you have anything to do with this site (often new users who immediately create an article on a given band, website, company, person etc. are somehow related to the article's subject), but you might want to give WP:COI a read. It doesn't prohibit you from editing any pages, but it does provide guidelines on how you should do so.
Finally, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you stick around and that you always feel free to ask me any questions you may have. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 01:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of Canadian EMR for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian EMR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian EMR until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Darkwind (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)