User talk:Englandfan7

Regarding edits to Indiana Wesleyan University

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Englandfan7! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 21:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Indiana Wesleyan University, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 21:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Iwu.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwu.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwuwildcat.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:?action=view&current=wildcat.jpg. The copy called Image:?action=view&current=wildcat.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. AntiSpamBot 22:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Iwugraph.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwugraph.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. AntiSpamBot 00:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Iwumall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwumall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Wesleyan University

Please stop removing the Cleanup tag from the article, unless and until the article has been cleaned up. There's a lot about the article that is formatted incorrectly. If you want to discuss, go to the article's talk. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 06:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Candicehansard.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Candice.jpg. The copy called Image:Candice.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 05:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to upload inappropriate images, such as Image:Beckhampresentation.jpg, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Don't upload stuff from Getty Images. This is NOT in the public domain. Kl4m 05:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it and posted another photo and listed the website. Why are you being so anal and blocking it?!

LA Galaxy

OK, I'll remove the speedy on [1]. This still goes on WP:IFD because of the url in the top-right corner. By the way, Are these photos really yours? The Getty one raises suspicion.

Possibly unfree Image:Becksunveiling.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Becksunveiling.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kl4m 05:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Beckslaunveiling.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Beckslaunveiling.jpg, by Staeckerbot (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Beckslaunveiling.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Beckslaunveiling.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Beckhamdebut.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Becksdebut.jpg. The copy called Image:Becksdebut.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 06:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Beckspresentation.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Beckspresentation.jpg, by Kl4m (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Beckspresentation.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Beckspresentation.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Iwumall.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwumall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Iwuwildcat.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwuwildcat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Iwugraph.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwugraph.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Galaxyawaykit.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Galaxyawaykit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JacќяМ ¿Qué? 06:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear this pictures are blatently search-engined, one even has a watermark, and i'm sure you're not the creator of your university logo. JacќяМ ¿Qué? 06:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Galaxyhomekit.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Galaxyhomekit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JacќяМ ¿Qué? 06:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked due to repeated copyright violations

Hello. Please note that your account has been blocked due to repeated copyright violations, including but not limited to passing off imagery subject to copyright as public domain. Please review Wikipedia:Uploading images as well as Wikipedia:Image use policy when you have the time, and then we can discuss enabling your editing privileges. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:Iwustudentcenter.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Iwustudentcenter.jpg, by Jackrm (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Iwustudentcenter.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Iwustudentcenter.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think i put the wrong tag on it, but image belongs to a banned user, and it links nowhere. JacќяМ ¿Qué? 07:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Englandfan7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing the decision by Can't sleep, clown will eat me to block my account. I am new to Wikipedia and still learning how to properly cite photos, thus I believe the block is unfair and an overreaction and should be overturned immediately.

Decline reason:

You received plenty of warnings. Please use this time to read up on WP:FU so you do not commit any further violations. — Yamla 22:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An indefinite block was probably unjustified, but incivil edits like these are not going to help your case. utcursch | talk 09:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So why don't you undo the block if you know it was wrong? -englandfan7

Yes, get another account and try to respect the guidelines this time. Wikipedians respect copyright. Kl4m 01:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Iwu wesley statue.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Iwu wesley statue.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Iwu wesley statue.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. rootology (T) 18:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Iwuprayerchapel.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Iwuprayerchapel.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Iwuprayerchapel.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. rootology (T) 18:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Iwuscripture hall.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Iwuscripture hall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Iwuscripture hall.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. rootology (T) 18:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iwugraph2.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iwugraph2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Iwumaxwellcenter.jpg

The file File:Iwumaxwellcenter.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]