User talk:EngineeringIsFun

EngineeringIsFun, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi EngineeringIsFun! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asteroid Redirect Mission may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Research Center | NASA Glenn]] to cost about $2.6 billion.<ref>NASA Solar System Exploration, [https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/profile.cfm?Sort=Nation&MCode=arm&Nation=USA&
profile.cfm?Sort=Nation&MCode=arm&Nation=USA&Display=ReadMore Asteroid Redirect Mission[ (accessed Sept. 30 2014)</ref> NASA [[Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Space Elevator

Hello EngineeringIsFun,

Thanks for joining us on Space Elevator. I want to explain the partial reverts I (and Tarl) made.

It's hard for others to review changes when there are so many all at once. It helps to get them through if they're done it small bites. When an edit gets ignored, that means it was reviewed and no one had too big a problem with it -- and that's a successful edit! :-) Even when it's ignored, be assured though that it was reviewed, and that all edits are looked at (or attempted to be looked at). If too many edits are made at once, it's hard for those silent reviewers to figure out what the heck was done. In that case, if the job of looking it over is too difficult it often results in a revert of all of it, regardless of what inside the whole shebang might actually be "good".

Your large block of edits wasn't fully reverted, which is unusual. But, it was a lot of work to figure it all out (for the parts that I was able to figure out). In the end I did simply revert the edits done to the "Related Concepts" because it was all very confusing yes, but also because "Related concepts" are a side discussion and somewhat off-topic and too-much discussion of it would be fully off topic.

I left in some other changes because I could more easily see what was done. Because I was able to see those changes, I was able to see that they were okay.

Anyway, I just wanted you to know where I was coming from in the large-ish reverts I (and Tarl) made. In the future, on Space Elevator and on other pages, it will help to make smaller (one change per edit) edits and to make only a few of them before waiting a bit before making more edits. That way nobody has to drink from a fire hose.

Skyway (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm somewhat puzzled here. I didn't think Space Elevator was protected, so I'm not sure what you're doing here. Have you considered just assume good faith? EngineeringIsFun (talk)