User talk:Endebyrd

Welcome!

Hi Endebyrd! I noticed your contributions to List of German Americans and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 15:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category verifiability

Please read WP:CATV. There must be verifiable information in the body of the article to support its inclusion in a category. Schazjmd (talk) 13:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, will include ancestry reference in future edits. Endebyrd (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I already took care of the Rittenhouser article. Btw, since you're interested in the List of German Americans article which I'm slowly trying to clean up, any text in the list about how they're German, I'll be removing, and you're welcome to help. Their ancestry is either supported in their article or by a source in the list, so editors' commentary on that is unnecessary (and often original research). I'm also removing all mentions that they're Jewish; there's no sensible reason to be "othering" them in the list. Schazjmd (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Schazjmd. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of German Americans, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding sources to your edits. Please do it with all of your future edits as well, when the target article fails to support your claims. Schazjmd (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The target articles never failed to support the claims being made, and I never changed the citation for Theodore Schultz. I only changed the Google Books link about Howard H. Aiken to a ".com" domain name. Google Books doesn't always display linked pages, but the Current link seems to be working now. Endebyrd (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither target article supports the claims, but your edit did cite sources, and I have no way to explain how I failed to see the sources in the edit. I apologize for completely misreading those two edits and reverting when I shouldn't have. Schazjmd (talk) 22:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Jayhawker6. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Conrad Hilton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jayhawker6 (talk) 17:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Endebyrd (talk) 17:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source mentioning the claim was later in the paragraph (the first source in the article [1]). I named the citation "Hilton" to use it twice, but now only the original access date is visible (December 21, 2020). Should it be revert it to the first edit I made, or should I add the same source again with today's date? Endebyrd (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Froelich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]