User talk:EmpyrosHunyadi

November 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Federalist Party (Argentina), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I erased the distinction left wing - right wing in both the unitarian party page and the federal party page. I havent heard a single argument that compels me to believe this is correct. This should be further discussed, but i can synthesize my points:

The unitarian party membership, at least in its early years, had strong monarchical convictions, the federalists were always pretty democratic.

The unitarian pary believed in census suffrage, the federalists, in universal suffrage.

The unitarian party was economically liberal, while the federalists were protectionists

The unitarian party was, also, really racist. (The federalists too, but unitarians were more combative in their borders policy against indians)

Both parties where supported by economic elites, but federalists were also supported by the masses

There are even more points, but i believe these are enough to explain why this distinction is retarded and doesnt make sense. Have a nice day. EmpyrosHunyadi (talk) 18:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Federalist Party (Argentina). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Unitarian Party, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]