User talk:Emperorpenguin20160923

.cn has a lot of fake information, please use Japanese website.--115.82.230.48 (talk) 12:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I used Shunroku Hata diary? I print some page from his diary, I can scanning to internet

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Battle of Changde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
If you really use multiple accounts, I think you should know that you are 3RR Witotiwo (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emperorpenguin20160923, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Emperorpenguin20160923! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Battle of Changde does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Witotiwo (talk) 11:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tag

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Changde, you may be blocked from editing. If this is a Japanese diary, please use Japanese reference.No Japanese diary will be written in Chinese. Witotiwo (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other

I also found that you have a similar appearance time with some vandal accounts that use proxy IP.You and his editing time difference is only 7 minutes.You and his editor are only 7 minutes away.It is incredible that you can respond quickly after I edit the page.This makes me more skeptical that you use multiple accounts, obviously you are monitoring certain pages.--Witotiwo (talk) 11:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That person is not me, I promise, I will follow the rule, thank you!Emperorpenquin20160923 (talk)

Ask you again

Please use the Japanese reference and the full Japanese diary.Chinese reference can only be used when there is a Japanese reference. If there is no Japanese language reference, please do not use the Chinese language reference, because you plan to use the Japanese diary as a reference. You are not planning to use the Chinese diary as a reference.--Witotiwo (talk) 12:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I used Chinese estimate?Emperorpenquin20160923(talk)

NO!!!!

Again, you plan to use a Japanese diary, not a Chinese diary. No Japanese diary will be written in Chinese, it must be a Japanese language. That is, you can only use the first-hand reference.Second-hand reference or three-hand reference may make the original diary rewritten, then lose the reference value.

In another way, reading the original text is more valuable than reading the translated text. I think Martin Luther is one of the representatives of this view.--Witotiwo (talk) 12:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]