Jump to content

User talk:Emott

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About Youtube videos

[edit]

You most likely didn't know this, but you really shouldn't add Youtube video links to the articles. They are someone else's work, so copyright issues must be regarded. They are also not always reliable. Kotiwalo (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 2 Girls 1 Cup. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 02:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 2 Girls 1 Cup has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page P. Craig Russell do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Elassint Hi 22:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Toby Radloff. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Elassint Hi 23:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concur on both counts. This is considered linkspamming. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. If you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Elassint Hi 23:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talk • contribs) 23:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Spam-tracking data

possibly related:

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 23:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have again today inserted spam links into at least P. Craig Russell and Harvey Pekar. You have been warned repeatedly about this behavior. If you do so again, an admin will be immediately asked to block you once again. Wikipedia is not to be used for personal promotion of your website. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Harvey Pekar ‎. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. More specifically, is there a valid reason for changing these links to point to your own site? CliffC (talk) 04:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lurid Media

[edit]

The article Lurid Media has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been tagged for notability since January 2010. No references and appears to be bordering more on advertising than encyclopedic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hugahoody (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emott&oldid=1139059937"