User talk:Emmadavis123/sandbox

Peer review- In providing a lead for this section of the article, it may be a good idea to provide a brief statement of how plentiful and varied the reviews are- this helps to cement the importance of the section. A few grammatical errors here and there. Nothing massive, but should be addressed before going live. "Forster's novel departed from typical narratives about colonizer-colonized relationships and emphasized a more "unknowable" Orient, rather than characterizing it with exoticism, ancient wisdom and mystery" But in emphasizing the "unknowable" is this not also reinforcing an Orientalist view? Make sure to distinguish how this is different from the other Orientalist texts of the time. When you write "radicalized" I believe you may mean "racialized." The structure of the section is solid and easy to follow. Providing balance to the section means showing all the kinds of literary criticism that might exist for such a book. However, I wouldn't call this a priority as our class is meant to be focusing on the postcolonial side of things. Other criticisms of the book are worth looking into if you have time, maybe? Expanding the mention of early critics could be a fairly easy way to do this, if there are available resources. I would say your section is worded neutrally and in an encyclopedic way. Your sources are well-chosen and contribute thoroughly to the topic. Mimetolith (talk) 00:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the great review! I will definitely refine my language when I discuss the Orientalism present in A Passage to India. There was a slight distinction made between creating an Orient that was understandable through Western tropes of exoticism, eroticism and mystery, but Forster's portrayal was somewhat different in that he prevented his audience from being able to contextualize India using Western constructs. Essentially, he made it so vague, and urged his reader to not understand, in order to keep India something that couldn't be taken or appropriated by Western audiences.Unfortunately I haven't been able to find many positive reviews of the novel that deal with the colonialism present in the novel, but I think if I just make it clear in this section that this isn't necessarily an summary of every review of the book, but a focused section on the criticism that the novel has garnered, I'll be okay. However, I will continue to look for more critiques of the work that provides a balanced view of the work. I will also fix the grammatical errors. Thanks so much for pointing those out! For some reason my Mac keyboard doesn't recognize the word "radicalized". Emmadavis123 (talk)