Jump to content

User talk:Emkaer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Emkaer (usurped))

Account login problem

[edit]

I just created the Emkaer-Account to edit the article of Hajo Holborn. But now I am not at all able to log in because of a broken password. What can I do? If someone could delete my Account, I could create it again. Thanks
Emkaer

I assume that you have made thorough checks at your end? Such as cookie handling, software firewall permissions, etc. Accounts are not deleted. If you provided an e-mail address for admins to contact you, then you can request a new password. Otherwise, you can abandon this account and create a new one, remembering to include an e-mail address this time. You might want to opt out of the ability to receive mail from other editors, or not opt in, whichever is the case. Adrian M. H. 17:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Recent incidents in which accounts with easy to guess passwords were hacked promted developers to automatically block people who choose their username or the word 'password' as their password. If you gave an email address when you signed up you can ask them to reset it. Otherwise, you'll have to make a new account and take care of your password security. - Mgm|(talk) 10:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I created a new account: User:TheUserFormallyKnownAsEmkaer. --Tufkae 14:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since this problem has been solved using WP:SUL and renaming accounts, I'm back as User:Emkaer. --Emkaer (talk) 23:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

copied from User talk:Emkaer (usurped)

Nomination of Stephen Palmquist for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Palmquist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Palmquist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ozob (talk) 01:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. If it's urgent, please consider contacting me at my german user talk page. --Emkaer (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]